Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 22;10(3):381.
doi: 10.3390/pathogens10030381.

Amplicon Sequencing of Variable 16S rRNA from Bacteria and ITS2 Regions from Fungi and Plants, Reveals Honeybee Susceptibility to Diseases Results from Their Forage Availability under Anthropogenic Landscapes

Affiliations

Amplicon Sequencing of Variable 16S rRNA from Bacteria and ITS2 Regions from Fungi and Plants, Reveals Honeybee Susceptibility to Diseases Results from Their Forage Availability under Anthropogenic Landscapes

Aneta A Ptaszyńska et al. Pathogens. .

Abstract

European Apis mellifera and Asian Apis cerana honeybees are essential crop pollinators. Microbiome studies can provide complex information on health and fitness of these insects in relation to environmental changes, and plant availability. Amplicon sequencing of variable regions of the 16S rRNA from bacteria and the internally transcribed spacer (ITS) regions from fungi and plants allow identification of the metabiome. These methods provide a tool for monitoring otherwise uncultured microbes isolated from the gut of the honeybees. They also help monitor the composition of the gut fungi and, intriguingly, pollen collected by the insect. Here, we present data from amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA from bacteria and ITS2 regions from fungi and plants derived from honeybees collected at various time points from anthropogenic landscapes such as urban areas in Poland, UK, Spain, Greece, and Thailand. We have analysed microbial content of honeybee intestine as well as fungi and pollens. Furthermore, isolated DNA was used as the template for screening pathogens: Nosema apis, N. ceranae, N. bombi, tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi), any organism in the parasitic order Trypanosomatida, including Crithidia spp. (i.e., Crithidia mellificae), neogregarines including Mattesia and Apicystis spp. (i.e., Apicistis bombi). We conclude that differences between samples were mainly influenced by the bacteria, plant pollen and fungi, respectively. Moreover, honeybees feeding on a sugar based diet were more prone to fungal pathogens (Nosema ceranae) and neogregarines. In most samples Nosema sp. and neogregarines parasitized the host bee at the same time. A higher load of fungi, and bacteria groups such as Firmicutes (Lactobacillus); γ-proteobacteria, Neisseriaceae, and other unidentified bacteria was observed for Nosema ceranae and neogregarine infected honeybees. Healthy honeybees had a higher load of plant pollen, and bacteria groups such as: Orbales, Gilliamella, Snodgrassella, and Enterobacteriaceae. Finally, the period when honeybees switch to the winter generation (longer-lived forager honeybees) is the most sensitive to diet perturbations, and hence pathogen attack, for the whole beekeeping season. It is possible that evolutionary adaptation of bees fails to benefit them in the modern anthropomorphised environment.

Keywords: 16S rRNA; Acarapis woodi; Apicystis spp.; Apis mellifera; Crithidia spp.; ITR2; NGS; Nosema apis; Nosema bombi; Nosema ceranae; Trypanosomatida; antropocene; bee biology; insectageddon; neogregarines; urban area; urban environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Composition of bacteria (A), fungi (B) and pollen (C) from Polish honeybee samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Composition of bacteria (A), fungi (B) and pollen (C) from UK, Greek, Spanish, and Thai bee samples.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Loading plot (a) and score plot (b) of the principal components’ analysis (PC1 and PC2) carried out on the analytical data of the taxonomy detected in the world bees (Thailand A.c.—A. cerana). Small letters on loading plot (a): b—data obtained from bacteria NGS analysis, f—data obtained from fungal NGS analysis, p—data obtained from plant NGS analysis.

References

    1. Yao R., Xu L., Lu G., Zhu L. Evaluation of the Function of Wild Animal Gut Microbiomes Using Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics and its Relevance to Animal Conservation. Evol. Bioinform. 2019;15:1176934319848438. doi: 10.1177/1176934319848438. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romero S., Nastasa A., Chapman A., Kwong W.K., Foster L.J. The honey bee gut microbiota: Strategies for study and characterization. Insect Mol. Biol. 2019;28:455–472. doi: 10.1111/imb.12567. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hawkins J., De Vere N., Griffith A., Ford C.R., Allainguillaume J., Hegarty M.J., Baillie L., Adams-Groom B. Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0134735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134735. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kešnerová L., Emery O., Troilo M., Liberti J., Erkosar B., Engel P. Gut microbiota structure differs between honeybees in winter and summer. ISME J. 2020;14:801–814. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0568-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tauber J.P., Nguyen V., Lopez D., Evans J.D. Effects of a Resident Yeast from the Honeybee Gut on Immunity, Microbiota, and Nosema Disease. Insects. 2019;10:296. doi: 10.3390/insects10090296. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources