Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 26;13(7):1539.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13071539.

The Evolving Role of Marked Lymph Node Biopsy (MLNB) and Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Affiliations
Review

The Evolving Role of Marked Lymph Node Biopsy (MLNB) and Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) for Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Parinita K Swarnkar et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Targeted axillary dissection (TAD) is a new axillary staging technique that consists of the surgical removal of biopsy-proven positive axillary nodes, which are marked (marked lymph node biopsy (MLNB)) prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in addition to the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In a meta-analysis of more than 3000 patients, we previously reported a false-negative rate (FNR) of 13% using the SLNB alone in this setting. The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis is to determine the FNR of MLNB alone and TAD (MLNB plus SLNB) compared with the gold standard of complete axillary lymph node dissection (cALND). The PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases were searched using MeSH-relevant terms and free words. A total of 9 studies of 366 patients that met the inclusion criteria evaluating the FNR of MLNB alone were included in the pooled analysis, yielding a pooled FNR of 6.28% (95% CI: 3.98-9.43). In 13 studies spanning 521 patients, the addition of SLNB to MLNB (TAD) was associated with a FNR of 5.18% (95% CI: 3.41-7.54), which was not significantly different from that of MLNB alone (p = 0.48). Data regarding the oncological safety of this approach were lacking. In a separate analysis of all published studies reporting successful identification and surgical retrieval of the MLN, we calculated a pooled success rate of 90.0% (95% CI: 85.1-95.1). The present pooled analysis demonstrates that the FNR associated with MLNB alone or combined with SLNB is acceptably low and both approaches are highly accurate in staging the axilla in patients with node-positive breast cancer after NACT. The SLNB adds minimal new information and therefore can be safely omitted from TAD. Further research to confirm the oncological safety of this de-escalation approach of axillary surgery is required. MLNB alone and TAD are associated with acceptably low FNRs and represent valid alternatives to cALND in patients with node-positive breast cancer after excellent response to NACT.

Keywords: breast cancer; node positive; systematic review; targeted axillary dissection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

K.M. has received honoraria for providing academic and clinical advisory to Merit Medical. P.K.S., S.T. and M.J.M. declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A PRISMA flow chart summarizing the results of data collection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
In (a), the patient had a metallic marker clip deployed within the pathological lymph node at the time of biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and a second localization procedure using Savi Scout prior to surgery. In (right), the patient had the Savi Scout reflector at the time of biopsy prior to NACT thus avoiding a second procedure. There were no MRI artifacts related to the Savi Scout reflector in (b). The surgical procedure of identification and retrieval of the Savi Scout reflector took 15 min. Scale bar: 10 mm.

References

    1. Charalampoudis P., Markopoulos C., Kovacs T. Controversies and recommendations regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: A comprehensive review of current data. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018;44:5–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.10.215. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wazir U., Mokbel K. De-escalation of axillary surgery in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting for breast cancer: Is it oncologically safe? Anticancer Res. 2020;40:5351–5354. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.14542. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Geng C., Chen X., Pan X., Li J. The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in initially clinically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0162605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162605. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pilewskie M., Morrow M. Axillary nodal management following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:549–555. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi H.J., Kim I., Alsharif E., Park S., Kim J.M., Ryu K.M., Nam S.J., Kim S.W., Yu J., Lee S.K., et al. Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer in diagnosis. J. Breast Cancer. 2018;21:433–441. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e54. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources