Immunogenicity and safety of sabin-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine replacing salk-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine: An innovative application of different strain-IPVs replacement
- PMID: 33810904
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.073
Immunogenicity and safety of sabin-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine replacing salk-strain based inactivated poliovirus vaccine: An innovative application of different strain-IPVs replacement
Abstract
Background: A domestic Sabin strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Sabin IPV) was approved by China Food and Drug Administration in 2017 as a replacement for the Salk strain-based inactivated poliovirus vaccine (Salk IPV) that has been in use in China for over 10 years. The present post-marketing trial was implemented in China to assess the immunogenicity and safety of replacing the Salk IPV with the Sabin IPV in the last two immunizations of the standard three-dose schedule.
Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial with two groups that received three doses of IPVs at the age of 2, 3, and 4 months: the Salk-Sabin-Sabin group and the Salk-Salk-Salk group. Blood samples were collected before vaccination and 30-40 days after the third dose of vaccination. The seroconversion rates and antibody geometric mean titers (GMTs) were calculated and analyzed to evaluate immunogenicity. The safety of both immunization schedules was also monitored and analyzed.
Results: Of 360 recruited healthy infants, all three IPV doses were administered and blood collection was completed in 330 infants. All participants (100%) in both groups were seropositive for all three poliovirus types after the last vaccination. There were significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.001) in the GMTs for antibodies against poliovirus types 1 and 2, but no significant difference was observed for antibodies against type 3 (P = 0.009). A non-inferiority t-test showed that the post-immunization GMTs for all three types in the Salk-Sabin-Sabin group were not inferior to those in the Salk-Salk-Salk group (P < 0.001). Safety assessment indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of all adverse events between the two groups (P = 0.806).
Conclusions: The Salk-Sabin-Sabin IPV immunization schedule is not inferior to the Salk-Salk-Salk IPV schedule in terms of both immunogenicity and safety. Clinical trial number: NCT04051736.
Keywords: Clinical trial; Inactivated polio vaccine; Poliovirus; Sabin strain; Salk strain.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Immunogenicity of three sequential schedules with Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine and bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine in Zhejiang, China: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;20(9):1071-1079. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30738-8. Epub 2020 May 19. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32442523 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of experimental stand-alone trivalent, inactivated Sabin-strain polio vaccine formulations in healthy infants: A randomized, observer-blind, controlled phase 1/2 trial.Vaccine. 2020 Jul 14;38(33):5313-5323. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.081. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 32563609 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Phase 3 Trial of a Sabin Strain-Based Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine.J Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;214(11):1728-1734. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw433. Epub 2016 Sep 22. J Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 27658691 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity of sequential inactivated and oral poliovirus vaccines (OPV) versus inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) alone in healthy infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(11):2636-2643. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1489188. Epub 2018 Jul 16. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 29985751 Free PMC article.
-
Immunogenicity to poliovirus type 2 following two doses of fractional intradermal inactivated poliovirus vaccine: A novel dose sparing immunization schedule.Vaccine. 2017 May 19;35(22):2993-2998. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 20. Vaccine. 2017. PMID: 28434691 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Designing a Novel Peptide-Based Multi-Epitope Vaccine to Evoke a Robust Immune Response against Pathogenic Multidrug-Resistant Providencia heimbachae.Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Aug 11;10(8):1300. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081300. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36016188 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of a Sabin-Strain Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine Response to a Circulating Type 2 Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Event in Sichuan Province, China 2019-2021.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2249710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49710. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 36602797 Free PMC article.
-
Immune persistence after different polio sequential immunization schedules in Chinese infants.NPJ Vaccines. 2024 Feb 29;9(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s41541-024-00831-1. NPJ Vaccines. 2024. PMID: 38424078 Free PMC article.
-
Designing a Recombinant Vaccine against Providencia rettgeri Using Immunoinformatics Approach.Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 25;10(2):189. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020189. Vaccines (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35214648 Free PMC article.
-
Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of the chinese inactivated poliovirus vaccine with the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine in children: A multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority, controlled trial.Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 26;13:905634. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.905634. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 35958596 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical