If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis
- PMID: 33811355
- DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12874
If fetuses are persons, abortion is a public health crisis
Abstract
Pro-life advocates commonly argue that fetuses have the moral status of persons, and an accompanying right to life, a view most pro-choice advocates deny. A difficulty for this pro-life position has been Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist analogy, in which she argues that even if the fetus is a person, abortion is often permissible because a pregnant woman is not obliged to continue to offer her body as life support. Here, we outline the moral theories underlying public health ethics, and examine the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of public health considerations overriding individual rights. We argue that if fetuses are regarded as persons, then abortion is of such prevalence in society that it also constitutes a significant public health crisis. We show that on public health considerations, we are justified in overriding individual rights to bodily autonomy by prohibiting abortion. We conclude that in a society that values public health, abortion can only be tolerated if fetuses are not regarded as persons.
Keywords: COVID-19; Thomson; abortion; moral status; persons; public health.
© 2021 The Authors. Bioethics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Comment in
-
Public health ethics and abortion: A response to Simkulet.Bioethics. 2022 May;36(4):469-471. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12981. Epub 2021 Dec 14. Bioethics. 2022. PMID: 34904272 No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
