Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 1;47(8):445-448.
doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000788.

Effect of Eye Spray Phospholipid Concentration on the Tear Film and Ocular Comfort

Affiliations

Effect of Eye Spray Phospholipid Concentration on the Tear Film and Ocular Comfort

Heiko Pult et al. Eye Contact Lens. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of eye spray phospholipid concentration on symptoms and tear film stability.

Methods: High-concentration (Tears Again, Optima Pharma GmbH, Hallbergmoos, Germany) and low-concentration (Ocuvers, Innomedis AG, Germany) phospholipid eye sprays were sprayed onto the closed eyelids of 30 subjects (33.2±1.8 years; 20 women) in a multicentered, prospective, crossover study. Ocular comfort (visual analog scale) and noninvasive tear film stability (NIBUT) of each eye were evaluated before application (along with the Ocular Surface Disease Index), 10 min after application, and 30 min after application.

Results: Comfort (high concentration: 68.5±16.4 vs. low concentration: 70.7±14.5 phospholipid) and NIBUT (high concentration: 11.5±4.6 sec vs. low concentration: 11.2±6.0 sec phospholipid) were not different (P>0.3) between sprays before application, but comfort (by 12 points, P=0.001) and NIBUT (by 5 sec, P=0.016) were significantly better with a high-concentration phospholipid spray at both 10 min and 30 min time points than those with the low-concentration phospholipid spray.

Conclusions: The liposomal eye spray with higher concentration of phospholipids significantly improved ocular comfort and tear film stability in contrast to the eye spray with lower concentration of phospholipids, hence practitioners need to choose an appropriate eye spray to maximize the patient benefit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Mean comfort scores (on a 100 point, visual analog scale) and standard error over the observation time of 0 to 30 min (high-concentration (HC) and low-concentration (LC) phospholipid spray).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Mean noninvasive breakup time [sec] and standard error over the observation time of 0 to 30 min (high-concentration [HC] and low-concentration [LC] phospholipid spray).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. . TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:539–574. - PubMed
    1. Lemp MA, Crews LA, Bron AJ, et al. . Distribution of aqueous-deficient and evaporative dry eye in a clinic-based patient cohort: A retrospective study. Cornea 2012;31:472–478. - PubMed
    1. Heiligenhaus A, Koch JM, Kruse FE, et al. . Diagnosis and and differentiation of dry eye disorders. Ophthalmologe 1995;92:6–11. - PubMed
    1. Mishima S, Maurice DM. The oily layer of the tear film and evaporation from the corneal surface. Exp Eye Res 1961;1:39–45. - PubMed
    1. Bron AJ, Tiffany JM, Gouveia SM, et al. . Functional aspects of the tear film lipid layer. Exp Eye Res 2004;78:347–360. - PubMed