Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Jun;40(6):488-493.
doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 Feb 20.

Use of donor-derived-cell-free DNA as a marker of early allograft injury in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) to predict the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)

Affiliations
Observational Study

Use of donor-derived-cell-free DNA as a marker of early allograft injury in primary graft dysfunction (PGD) to predict the risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)

Michael Keller et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). However, the association between PGD and degree of allograft injury remains poorly defined. In this study, we leverage a novel biomarker for allograft injury, percentage donor-derived cell-free DNA (%ddcfDNA), to study the association between PGD, degree of allograft injury, and the development of CLAD.

Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited 99 lung transplant recipients and collected plasma samples on days 1, 3, and 7 for %ddcfDNA measurements. Clinical data on day 3 was used to adjudicate for PGD. %ddcfDNA levels were compared between PGD grades. In PGD patients, %ddcfDNA was compared between those who developed CLAD and those who did not.

Results: On posttransplant day 3, %ddcfDNA was higher in PGD than in non-PGD patients (median [IQR]: 12.2% [8.2, 22.0] vs 8.5% [5.6, 13.2] p = 0.01). %ddcfDNA correlated with the severity grade of PGD (r = 0.24, p = 0.02). Within the PGD group, higher levels of %ddcfDNA correlated with increased risk of developing CLAD (log OR(SE) 1.38 (0.53), p = 0.009). PGD patients who developed CLAD showed ∼2-times higher %ddcfDNA levels than patients who did not develop CLAD (median [IQR]: 22.4% [11.8, 27.6] vs 9.9% [6.7, 14.9], p = 0.007).

Conclusion: PGD patients demonstrated increased early posttransplant allograft injury, as measured by %ddcfDNA, in comparison to non-PGD patients, and these high %ddcfDNA levels were associated with subsequent development of CLAD. This study suggests that %ddcfDNA identifies PGD patients at greater risk of CLAD than PGD alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01985412 NCT02423070.

Keywords: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD); Donorderived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA); Primary graft dysfunction (PGD); Rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Trend in %ddcfDNA over the first post-transplant week in PGD and non-PGD patients. Each point represents median values with interquartile range. Levels of %ddcfDNA were higher in patients with PGD than in patients without PGD on days 1, 3 and 7 (Day 7 values, median (IQR): 4.7% (3.0,8.9) vs 3.3% (2.4, 5.4), p=0.046) (b) Comparison of day 3 %ddcfDNA between PGD and non-PGD patients displayed with violin plots including all individual data points, median and IQR values PGD patients demonstrated higher levels of %ddcfDNA than non-PGD patients (median (IQR): 12.2% (8.2, 22.0) vs 8.5% (5.6, 13.2), p = 0.01).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Trend in %ddcfDNA over the first week post-transplant in PGD+/CLAD+ patients and PGD+/CLAD− patients. Each point represents median values with interquartile range. (b) Comparison of day 3 %ddcfDNA between PGD+/CLAD+ patients vs PGD+/CLAD− patients displayed with violin plots including all individual data points, median and IQR values. PGD+/CLAD+ patients demonstrated higher levels of %ddcfDNA than PGD+/CLAD− patients (Day 3 median (IQR): 22.4% (11.8, 27.6) vs. 9.9% (6.9, 14.9), p = 0.007).

References

    1. Snell GI, et al., Report of the ISHLT Working Group on Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction, part I: Definition and grading-A 2016 Consensus Group statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant, 2017. 36(10): p. 1097–1103. - PubMed
    1. Kreisel D, et al., Short- and long-term outcomes of 1000 adult lung transplant recipients at a single center. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2011. 141(1): p. 215–22. - PubMed
    1. Daud SA, et al., Impact of immediate primary lung allograft dysfunction on bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2007. 175(5): p. 507–13. - PubMed
    1. Gielis EM, et al., Cell-Free DNA: An Upcoming Biomarker in Transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2015. 15(10): p. 2541–51. - PubMed
    1. Bloom RD, et al., Cell-Free DNA and Active Rejection in Kidney Allografts. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2017. 28(7): p. 2221–2232. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data