Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;12(1):182-189.
doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01274-5. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features

Affiliations

The Positive Predictive Values of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 Lesions and its Mammographic Morphological Features

Suvendu Kumar Mohapatra et al. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) is a comprehensive guideline to systematize breast imaging reporting, and as per its recommendations, any lesion with likelihoods of malignancy greater than 2% is deemed as suspicious and tissue diagnosis is recommended. The aim of the study is to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of BI-RADS categories 4a, 4b, and 4c for malignancy and association of mammographic morphological features of BI-RADS 4 subgroups with malignant outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed all the patients undergoing mammography with BI-RADS score of 4 followed by biopsy from May 2019 to April 2020. The predictive values of BI-RADS 4 subcategories and morphological features with malignancy are performed taking histopathology report as the gold standard. The PPV of BI-RADS subcategories 4a, 4b, and 4c for malignancies were 34, 89, and 97%, respectively. BI-RADS 4c patients tend to be older (50.2 ± 12.2 vs. 44.6 ± 10.3 years) with larger mass (44 ± 16 vs. 32.9 ± 16.8 mm) at presentation than 4a. Postmenopausal state (P = 0.03) and older age (P = 0.019) were significantly associated with malignancy. There is no meaningful difference observed in the predictability of BI-RADS category 4c lesions among different breast density patterns. The overall higher PPV for BI-RADS 4a and 4b reflects subjectivity in subcategory assignments of BI-RADS 4. In patients, less than 40 years with the BI-RADS 4a category on mammograms may undergo supplementary imaging with MRI which may downscale the lesion classification in turn reducing unnecessary biopsy and surgery.

Keywords: BI-RADS 4; Malignancy; Mammography; Morphology; Positive predictive value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Details of the Inclusion and Exclusion criteria for the study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Demonstrating imaging features in BI-RADS 4 subcategories (4a, 4b, and 4c). a Irregular mass with obscured margin (4a). b Irregular mass with microlobulation (4b). irregular mass with microlobulation with irregular mass with spiculations (4c)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
    1. Inappropriate use of “probably benign” assessment category in screening mammograms national quality strategy domain: efficiency and cost reduction. https://www.acr.org/%20~/ media/ACR/Documents/P4P/2016%20PQRS/DX/2016_PQRS_Measure_146_11_17_2015.pdf. Updated November 17, 2015. Accessed January 14, 2017.
    1. Elezaby M, Li G, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Burnside ES, DeMartini WB. ACR BI-RADS assessment category 4 subdivisions in diagnostic mammography: utilization and outcomes in the National Mammography Database. Radiology. 2018;287(2):416–422. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170770. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. D’Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS—breast imaging atlas. American College of Radiology: Reston, Va; 2003.
    1. Puliti D, Duffy SW, Miccinesi G, de Koning H, Lynge E, Zappa M, Paci E. Overdiagnosis in mammographic screening for breast cancer in Europe: a literature review. J Med Screen. 2012;19(1 suppl):42–56. doi: 10.1258/jms.2012.012082. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources