Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 18:12:615699.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.615699. eCollection 2021.

Communication of Diagnosis of Infertility: A Systematic Review

Laura Mosconi  1 , Giada Crescioli  2   3 , Alfredo Vannacci  1   2   3 , Claudia Ravaldi  1   2   3
Affiliations

Communication of Diagnosis of Infertility: A Systematic Review

Laura Mosconi et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Background: When infertility is diagnosed, physicians have the difficult task to break bad news. Their communication skills play a central role in improving patients' coping abilities and adherence to infertility treatments. However, specific guidelines and training courses on this topic are still lacking. The aim of the present study is to provide some practical advice for improving breaking bad news in infertility diagnosis through a systematic literature review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Methods: Electronic searches were performed in the MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection databases. All articles focusing on the communication of the diagnosis of infertility were included. The main findings of each included article were then summarized. Results: Literature search identified 11,838 references that were screened for eligibility. Full texts of 81 articles were retrieved, and their analysis led to the inclusion of 4 articles, which treated the theme of communication of infertility only partially. The main addressed aspects concerning the communication of the infertility diagnosis were the following: (i) the value that patients give to healthcare professionals' communication skills; (ii) the importance of giving clear information on diagnostic procedures and treatments in order to decrease patients' anxiety; and (iii) the importance of involving both partners. Conclusions: This review pointed out that the communication of the infertility diagnosis is still underinvestigated. Specific guidelines are currently not available, but other protocols could be used. Taking into account the principal aspects of communication highlighted with this review, in this study, we suggested an adaptation of the original SPIKES protocol that could be used by healthcare professionals for the communication of the infertility status.

Keywords: care; communication; counseling; infertility; perinatal care; prenatal care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses PRISMA flowchart of search strategy results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ansha Patel P. S. V. N., Sharma P. K. (2018). In cycles of dreams, despair, and desperation: research perspectives on infertility specific distress in patients undergoing fertility treatments. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 11, 320–328. 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_42_18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baile W. F., Buckman R., Lenzi R., Glober G., Beale E. A., Kudelka A. P. (2000). SPIKES—a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5, 302–311. 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) (2014). Stepwise Approach for the Prescription of Opiates for Non-Cancer Pain: A Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK263404/ (accessed December 01, 2020). - PubMed
    1. Chachamovich J. R., Chachamovich E., Ezer H., Fleck M. P., Knauth D., Passos E. P. (2010). Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: a systematic review. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynecol. 31, 101–110. 10.3109/0167482X.2010.481337 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dancet E. A. F., Dhooghe T. M., Sermeus W., Van Empel I., Strohmer H., Wyns C., et al. . (2012). Patients from across Europe have similar views on patient-centred care: an international multilingual qualitative study in infertility care. Hum. Reprod. 27, 1702–1711. 10.1093/humrep/des061 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types