Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
- PMID: 33815844
- PMCID: PMC7994086
- DOI: 10.1155/2021/6658679
Prediction Score for Cervical Spine Fracture in Patients with Traumatic Neck Injury
Abstract
Background: Cervical spine fracture is approximately 2%-5%. Diagnostic imaging in developing countries has several limitations. A computed tomography scan is not available 24 hours and not cost-effective. This study aims to develop a clinical tool to identify patients who must undergo a computed tomography scan to evaluate cervical spine fracture in a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital.
Methods: The study was a diagnostic prediction rule. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018, at the emergency department. This study included all patients aged over 16 years who had suspected cervical spine injury and underwent a computed tomography scan at the emergency department. The predictive model and prediction scores were developed via multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Results: 375 patients met the criteria. 29 (7.73%) presented with cervical spine fracture on computed tomography scan and 346 did not. Five independent factors (i.e., high-risk mechanism of injury, paraparesis, paresthesia, limited range of motion of the neck, and associated chest or facial injury) were considered good predictors of C-spine fracture. The clinical prediction score for C-spine fracture was developed by dividing the patients into three probability groups (low, 0; moderate, 1-5; and high, 6-11), and the accuracy was 82.52%. In patients with a score of 1-5, the positive likelihood ratio for C-spine fracture was 1.46. Meanwhile, those with a score of 6-11 had an LR+ of 7.16.
Conclusion: In a noncomputed tomography scan available hospital, traumatic spine injuries patients with a clinical prediction score ≥1 were associated with cervical spine fracture and should undergo computed tomography scan to evaluate C-spine fracture.
Copyright © 2021 Natsinee Athinartrattanapong et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Does CT Angiography Matter for Patients with Cervical Spine Injuries?J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 4;96(11):951-955. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00036. Epub 2014 Jun 4. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 24897744
-
Cervical spine fractures in patients 65 years and older: a clinical prediction rule for blunt trauma.Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):143-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2341031692. Epub 2004 Nov 24. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15564392
-
Clinical examination in complement with computed tomography scan: an effective method for identification of cervical spine injury.J Trauma. 2009 Dec;67(6):1297-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c0b604. J Trauma. 2009. PMID: 20009681
-
Blunt Thoracolumbar-Spine Trauma Evaluation in the Emergency Department: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy for History, Physical Examination, and Imaging.J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):153-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Dec 28. J Emerg Med. 2019. PMID: 30598296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan--a meta-analysis and cohort study.Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 12. Injury. 2013. PMID: 23856632 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the Efficacy of Long Spinal Board, Sked Stretcher, and Vacuum Mattress in Cervical Spine Immobilization; a Method-Oriented Experimental Study.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 12;11(1):e44. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2036. eCollection 2023. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37609542 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for evaluation of C-spine injury from lateral neck radiographs.Heliyon. 2022 Aug 24;8(8):e10372. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10372. eCollection 2022 Aug. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 36061007 Free PMC article.
-
Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation: A Consideration for Manual In-Line Stabilization Without Cervical Collar Versus Full Immobilization.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jan 25;21:103-109. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S486978. eCollection 2025. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025. PMID: 39882274 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU Sensor) for Measurement of Cervical Spine Motion, Compared with Eight Optoelectronic 3D Cameras Under Spinal Immobilization Devices.Med Devices (Auckl). 2024 Jul 16;17:261-269. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S475166. eCollection 2024. Med Devices (Auckl). 2024. PMID: 39050910 Free PMC article.
-
Traditional Spinal Immobilization versus Spinal Motion Restriction in Cervical Spine Movement; a Randomized Crossover Trial.Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 12;12(1):e36. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2263. eCollection 2024. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38737134 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous