Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 19:11:625229.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.625229. eCollection 2021.

Dysbiosis of the Human Oral Microbiome During the Menstrual Cycle and Vulnerability to the External Exposures of Smoking and Dietary Sugar

Affiliations

Dysbiosis of the Human Oral Microbiome During the Menstrual Cycle and Vulnerability to the External Exposures of Smoking and Dietary Sugar

Nagihan Bostanci et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Physiological hormonal fluctuations exert endogenous pressures on the structure and function of the human microbiome. As such, the menstrual cycle may selectively disrupt the homeostasis of the resident oral microbiome, thus compromising oral health. Hence, the aim of the present study was to structurally and functionally profile the salivary microbiome of 103 women in reproductive age with regular menstrual cycle, while evaluating the modifying influences of hormonal contraceptives, sex hormones, diet, and smoking. Whole saliva was sampled during the menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases (n = 309) of the cycle, and the participants reported questionnaire-based data concerning their life habits and oral or systemic health. No significant differences in alpha-diversity or phase-specific clustering of the overall microbiome were observed. Nevertheless, the salivary abundances of genera Campylobacter, Haemophilus, Prevotella, and Oribacterium varied throughout the cycle, and a higher species-richness was observed during the luteal phase. While the overall community structure maintained relatively intact, its functional properties were drastically affected. In particular, 11 functional modules were differentially abundant throughout the menstrual cycle, including pentose phosphate metabolism, and biosynthesis of cobalamin and neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid. The menstrual cycle phase, but not oral contraceptive usage, was accountable for greater variations in the metabolic pathways of the salivary microbiome. Further co-risk factor analysis demonstrated that Prevotella and Veillonella were increased in current smokers, whereas high dietary sugar consumption modified the richness and diversity of the microbiome during the cycle. This is the first large study to systematically address dysbiotic variations of the oral microbiome during the course of menstrual cycle, and document the additive effect of smoking and sugar consumption as environmental risk factors. It reveals the structural resilience and functional adaptability of the oral microbiome to the endogenous hormonal pressures of the menstrual cycle, while revealing its vulnerability to the exogenous exposures of diet and smoking.

Keywords: diet; hormonal contraceptives; menstrual cycle; oral microbiome; saliva; shotgun sequencing; sugar; women’s health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author KW was employed by Ferring International Center SA. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar plot displaying the taxonomic composition of samples, sorted by phase of the menstrual cycle and contraceptive method.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Violin plots representing the distribution in relative abundance for each phase of the menstrual cycle for the four genera found to vary across the cycle. Pink: menstrual. Yellow: follicular. Green: luteal.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Richness (observed species) and (B) Diversity (inverted Simpson's index) in each contraceptive group and phase of the menstrual cycle. Pink: menstrual. Yellow: follicular. Green: luteal.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) of each sample, based on Bray-Curtis distance. The left panel depicts PC1 and PC2, while the right panel depicts PC1 and PC5. Other principal components are depicted in Supplementary Figure 3. The species with highest impact on the depicted principal components are overlaid as grey arrows. Red: menstrual phase. Yellow: follicular phase. Blue: luteal phase. Circle: non-hormonal contraceptives. Square: combined oral contraceptives. Triangle: intra-uterine levonegestrel system. H. parainfluenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae; N. flavescens, Neisseria flavescens; N. mucosa, Neisseria mucosa; N. subflava, Neisseria subflava; oral taxon 306, Prevotella sp. oral taxon 306; oral taxon 313, Prevotella sp. oral taxon 313; P. histicola, Prevotella histicola; P. melaninogenica, Prevotella melaninogenica; P. pallens, Prevotella pallens; R. dentocariosa, Rothia dentocariosa; R. mucilaginosa, Rothia mucilaginosa; S. mitis, Streptococcus mitis; S. parasanguinis, Streptococcus parasanguinis; S. salivarius, Streptococcus salivarius; V. atypica, Veillonella atypica; V. dispar, Veillonella dispar.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Violin plot representing the distribution in relative abundance for each phase of the menstrual cycle method for species of the Socransky complexes. The blue, yellow, green, and purple complexes are associated with periodontal health, whereas the orange and red complexes are correlated with periodontal disease.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Violin plot representing the distribution in relative abundance for each phase of the menstrual cycle according to the subgingival core microbiome classification (green: health-associated; red: periodontitis-associated).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Shifts of functional gene composition. Boxplots presenting pathways that are differentially abundant during the menstrual cycle or according to contraceptive usage. Detailed results are presented in Supplementary Table 5.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abusleme L., Dupuy A. K., Dutzan N., Silva N., Burleson J. A., Strausbaugh L. D., et al. . (2013). The subgingival microbiome in health and periodontitis and its relationship with community biomass and inflammation. ISME J. 7, 1016–1025. 10.1038/ismej.2012.174 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AC N. W., Sundstrom-Poromaa I., Backstrom T. (2006). Action by and sensitivity to neuroactive steroids in menstrual cycle related CNS disorders. Psychopharmacol. (Berl) 186, 388–401. 10.1007/s00213-005-0185-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belibasakis G. N., Bostanci N., Marsh P. D., Zaura E. (2019). Applications of the oral microbiome in personalized dentistry. Arch. Oral. Biol. 104, 7–12. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.05.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bik E. M., Long C. D., Armitage G. C., Loomer P., Emerson J., Mongodin E. F., et al. . (2010). Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals. ISME J. 4, 962–974. 10.1038/ismej.2010.30 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bostanci N., Allaker R. P., Belibasakis G. N., Rangarajan M., Curtis M. A., Hughes F. J., et al. . (2007). Porphyromonas gingivalis antagonises Campylobacter rectus induced cytokine production by human monocytes. Cytokine 39, 147–156. 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.07.002 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types