Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 19:8:622541.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.622541. eCollection 2021.

Patient Provider Continuity and Prostate Specific Antigen Testing: Impact of Continuity on Receipt of a Non-recommended Test

Arch G Mainous 3rd  1   2 , Benjamin J Rooks  1 , Elvira S Mercado  1 , Peter J Carek  1
Affiliations

Patient Provider Continuity and Prostate Specific Antigen Testing: Impact of Continuity on Receipt of a Non-recommended Test

Arch G Mainous 3rd et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: Continuity of care with a regular physician has been associated with treatment adherence but it is unclear if continuity of care may lead to inappropriate treatments. We assessed the relationship between the receipt of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a non-recommended test, and having continuity with a single personal doctor. Methods: We analyzed the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Responses from men aged 40 and older with no symptoms or family history of prostate cancer were analyzed (unweighted n = 232,548, representing 36,919,766 individuals). Continuity with one doctor was analyzed in relation to discussions of advantages and disadvantages of PSA tests, provider recommendation to receive a test and receipt of a PSA test. Results: 39.5% of men received PSA screening during the time that the test was not recommended. Having a single personal doctor was associated with discussion of both advantages (53.3 vs. 29.7%, p < 0.001) and disadvantages (24.2 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) of PSA tests but also a recommendation to receive a PSA test (45.3 vs. 29.3%, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of receiving a PSA test was higher among those with a single personal doctor compared to those without (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 2.17-2.46). Conclusion: In a nationally representative sample during the time when PSA screening was not recommended by the US Preventive Services Taskforce, having a single personal doctor was associated with both recommendations for the test and receipt of the test. These findings emphasize the importance of the patient physician relationship and the need for evidence-based care.

Keywords: continuity; patient–doctor relationship; prostate; trust; value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Mainous AG, 3rd, Gill JM. The importance of continuity of care in the likelihood of future hospitalization: is site of care equivalent to a primary clinician? Am J Public Health. (1998) 88:1539–41. 10.2105/AJPH.88.10.1539 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gill JM, Mainous AG, 3rd. The role of provider continuity in preventing hospitalizations. Arch Fam Med. (1998) 7:352–7. 10.1001/archfami.7.4.352 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gill JM, Mainous AG, 3rd, Nsereko M. The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use. Arch Fam Med. (2000) 9:333–8. 10.1001/archfami.9.4.333 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, Thorne A, Evans PH. Continuity of care with doctors-a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e021161. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021161 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen CC, Cheng SH. Continuity of care and changes in medication adherence among patients with newly diagnosed diabetes. Am J Manag Care. (2016) 22:136–142. - PubMed