Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 22:14:376-383.
doi: 10.1515/biol-2019-0042. eCollection 2019 Jan.

The Effects of Various Mouthwashes on Osteoblast Precursor Cells

Affiliations

The Effects of Various Mouthwashes on Osteoblast Precursor Cells

In-Seok Song et al. Open Life Sci. .

Abstract

This study examined whether or not various mouthwashes have significant effects on the viability or morphology of mouse osteoblast-like cells. Mouse calvarial preosteoblast cells were cultured and prepared, then treated with a 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate solution containing essential oils with or without alcohol, and a cetylpyridinium chloride solution, and sodium fluoride, respectively. Each well was treated with one of six mouthwashes for either 30 sec, 1.5 min, or 4.5 min. The viability of the treated cells was quantitatively analyzed by a Cell Counting Kit-8. The viability of osteogenic progenitor cells decreased significantly irrespectively of the types of mouthwashes. The changes of cell morphology were seen in all groups of mouthwashes; however, they were more noticeable on the chlorhexidine digluconate-treated group. A progressive increase in treatment time over 30 sec did not seem to deteriorate cellular viability. There was no significant difference in viability or morphological change between different formulations of the same brand. Although various mouthwashes without alcohol as an ingredient are available, nonalcoholic mouthwashes were not likely to be less harmful to the cells. Collectively, commercially available mouthwashes could inhibit cell viability and alter the morphology of osteoblastic precursor cells irrespectively of brands, treatment time, or alcohol content.

Keywords: cell survival; mouthwashes; osteoblasts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram showing the overview of the study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of cellular morphology after treatment with 0.12% CHX, LIS Citrus, and LIS Zero. The scale bar indicates 200 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cellular viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 after treatment with 0.12% CHX, LIS Citrus, and LIS Zero.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evaluation of cellular morphology after treatment with Gargin® formulations (GGN, GGN Med, and GGN Child).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cellular viability using Cell Counting Kit-8 after treatment with Gargin® formulations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsourounakis I, Palaiologou-Gallis AA, Stoute D. Effect of essential oil and chlorhexidine mouthwashes on gingival fibroblast survival and migration. J Periodontol. 2013;84:1211–1220. - PubMed
    1. Chen Y, Wong RW, Seneviratne CJ. Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:537–542. - PubMed
    1. Albert-Kiszely A, Pjetursson BE, Salvil GE. Comparison of the effects of cetylpyridinium chloride with an essential oil mouth rinse on dental plaque and gingivitis - a six-month randomized controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2007;34:658–667. - PubMed
    1. Costa X, Laguna E, Herrera D. Efficacy of a new mouth rinse formulation based on 0.07% cetylpyridinium chloride in the control of plaque and gingivitis: a 6-month randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:1007–1015. - PubMed
    1. Haps S, Slot DE, Berchier CE. The effect of cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouth rinses as adjuncts to toothbrushing on plaque and parameters of gingival inflammation: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2008;6:290–303. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources