Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 18;7(3):e06513.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06513. eCollection 2021 Mar.

Temporal oral microbiome changes with brushing in children with cleft lip and palate

Affiliations

Temporal oral microbiome changes with brushing in children with cleft lip and palate

Rita Rodrigues et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

This cohort study aimed to characterize the oral microbiome of children with CLP, from two different age groups, and evaluate the effect of supervised or unsupervised toothbrushing on the microbiome of the cleft over time. Swab samples were collected from the cleft area at three different time points (A; no brushing, B; after 15 days and C; after 30 days) and were analyzed using next-generation sequencing to determine the microbial composition and diversity in these time points. Overall, brushing significantly decreased the abundance of the genera Alloprevotella and Leptotrichia in the two age groups examined, and for Alloprevotella this decrease was more evident for children (2-6 years old). In the preteen group (7-12 years old), a significant relative increase of the genus Rothia was observed after brushing. In this study, the systematic brushing over a period of thirty days also resulted in differences at the intra-individual bacterial richness.

Keywords: Alloprevotella; CLP; Children and preteen; Leptotrichia; Microbiome; Next-generation sequencing; Rothia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Rarefaction curves. Rarefaction curves of calculated for observed richness (top) and H (bottom) at 1 to 20000 sequencing reads, separated for child (left) and Tween (right), with samples grouped by timepoint with bars indicating standard deviations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phylum level microbiome composition at timepoint A, per patient. Bar plot showing the relative abundance of all phyla with a mean abundance above 1% and remaining phyla group as Other.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Genus level microbiome composition at time point A, per patient. Bar plot showing the relative abundance of all genera with a mean abundance above 4% and remaining genera group as “Other”.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Boxplot of alpha diversity at time point A for children and preteen determined by observed richness and Shannon Diversity Index (H). Line in box indicates median value, box covers 95% confidence intervals, vertical lines reaches to furthest samples within 1.5 x box height and any outliers are indicated as points.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Heatmap of 10 most abundant genera at time point B and C. The two top rows indicate the age group and time point of each sample. The abundances are shown as percentages with the blue-yellow-red color scale.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Boxplot of the alpha diversity for children and preteen. Boxplots are colored according to brushing (Baseline: red, Brushing: turquois), measured as both observed richness (left) and Shannon Diversity Index (H) (right). Line in box indicates median value, box covers 95% confidence intervals, vertical lines reaches to furthest samples within 1.5 x box height and any outliers are indicated as points.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Boxplots of the relative abundance change (RAC) and abundance of significantly changing genera. A. Boxplot of RAC, per group (child: yellow, preteen blue), for any genus with RAC significantly different from 0 in any of the 3 timespans (Significant change, yes: Black edge, no: green edge), or which differs significantly between groups in any of the timespans (Significant difference, yes: solid fill, no: pale fill). B. Boxplot of the genus abundance of the relevant genera, edge color indicates time point (A (day 0): red, B (day 15): green, C (day 30): blue). Line in box indicates median value, box covers 95% confidence intervals, vertical lines reaches to furthest samples within 1.5 x box height and any outliers are indicated as points.

References

    1. Ahluwalia M., Brailsford S.R., Tarelli E., Gilbert S.C., Clark D.T., Barnard K., Beighton D. Dental caries, oral hygiene, and oral clearance in children with craniofacial disorders. J. Dent. Res. 2004;83:175–179. - PubMed
    1. Boloor V., Thomas B. Comparison of periodontal status among patients with cleft lip, cleft palate, and cleft lip along with a cleft in palate and alveolus. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2010;14:168–172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bolyen E., Rideout J.R., Dillon M.R., Bokulich N.A., Abnet C., Al-Ghalith G.A., Alexander H., Alm E.J., Arumugam Asnicar. Qiime 2: reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. Peer J Preprints. 2018;6 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bragger U., Schurch E., Jr., Gusberti F.A., Lang N.P. Periodontal conditions in adolescents with cleft lip, alveolus and palate following treatment in a co-ordinated team approach. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1985;12:494–502. - PubMed
    1. Callahan B.J., McMurdie P.J., Rosen M.J., Han A.W., Johnson A.J., Holmes S.P. Dada2: high-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods. 2016;13:581–583. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources