Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 May;69(3):1319-1325.
doi: 10.1111/tbed.14094. Epub 2021 May 18.

Face-touching behaviour as a possible correlate of mask-wearing: A video observational study of public place incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations
Observational Study

Face-touching behaviour as a possible correlate of mask-wearing: A video observational study of public place incidents during the COVID-19 pandemic

Lasse S Liebst et al. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 May.

Abstract

Most countries in the world have recommended or mandated face masks in some or all public places during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, mask use has been thought to increase people's face-touching frequency and thus risk of self-inoculation. Across two studies, we video-observed the face-touching behaviour of members of the public in Amsterdam and Rotterdam (the Netherlands) during the first wave of the pandemic. Study 1 (n = 383) yielded evidence in favour of the absence of an association between mask-wearing and face-touching (defined as touches of face or mask), and Study 2 (n = 421) replicated this result. Secondary outcome analysis of the two studies-analysed separately and with pooled data sets-evidenced a negative association between mask-wearing and hand contact with the face and its t-zone (i.e. eyes, nose and mouth). In sum, the current findings alleviate the concern that mask-wearing has an adverse face-touching effect.

Keywords: COVID-19; face-touching; masks; real-life behaviour; video observation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Regression results of the association between mask‐wearing and the primary and secondary face‐touching outcomes in Study 1, Study 2 and Combined analysis. Note Beta estimates and 95% and 99.5% confidence intervals, controlled for age, gender, observation duration and people crowding (for estimated results of the control variables, see the full regression output at osf.io/7ek9d)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. APA (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association.
    1. Benjamin, D. J. , Berger, J. O. , Johannesson, M. , Nosek, B. A. , Wagenmakers, E.‐J. , Berk, R. , Bollen, K. A. , Brembs, B. , Brown, L. , Camerer, C. , Cesarini, D. , Chambers, C. D. , Clyde, M. , Cook, T. D. , De Boeck, P. , Dienes, Z. , Dreber, A. , Easwaran, K. , Efferson, C. , … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 6–10. 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breen, R. , Karlson, K. B. , & Holm, A. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 39–54. 10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429 - DOI
    1. Chen, Y.‐J. , Qin, G. , Chen, J. , Xu, J.‐L. , Feng, D.‐Y. , Wu, X.‐Y. , & Li, X. (2020). Comparison of face‐touching behaviors before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Network Open, 3, e2016924. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16924 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum Associates.

Publication types