Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;19(2):257-261.
doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000134.

Psychological well-being of palliative care professionals: Who cares?

Beatriz Moreno-Milan  1 , Bill Breitbart  2 , Benjamin Herreros  3 , Karmele Olaciregui Dague  4 , María Cristina Coca Pereira  3
Affiliations

Psychological well-being of palliative care professionals: Who cares?

Beatriz Moreno-Milan et al. Palliat Support Care. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Traditionally, the psychological well-being of healthcare workers has been taken for granted - it has even been considered a part of the requirements that were demanded of them. When these professionals have experienced suffering and psychological depletion, they have been held accountable for this suffering, adopting an individualistic and reductionist viewpoint focused only on the professional. This approach has become obsolete due to its proven ineffectiveness, especially from an ethics of responsibility and organization viewpoint.

Context: The psychological well-being of the healthcare worker (and its opposites: suffering, exhaustion, and disenchantment) is advantageous to the professional's commitment to the institution, to their work performance, and to their personal life.

Objective: The objective of this paper is to reflect on the psychological suffering of the palliative care professional.

Method: We will reflect on the three levels of responsibility that influence such suffering (micro-meso-macro-ethical; worker-environment-institution).

Results: We will propose a global strategy for the care of psychological well-being supported by scientific evidence and key references.

Significance of results: We conclude with some contributions on what we have learned and still have to learn on this topic.

Keywords: Palliative medicine; Professional; Psychological well-being; Responsibility; Suffering.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aasland OG (2015) Healthy doctors — Sick medicine. Professions and Professionalism 5(1), 989. doi:10.7577/pp.989. - DOI
    1. Araya AX and Iriarte E (2018a) Fragilidad social: Construcción de un índice de medición. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología 53(1), 55. doi:10.1016/j.regg.2018.04.132. - DOI
    1. Araya AX and Iriarte E (2018b) Predictores de la fragilidad social en personas mayores que viven en la comunidad. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología 53(1), 55. doi:10.1016/j.regg.2018.04.133. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asuero M and García de la Banda G (2010) The mindfulness-based stress reduction program (MBSR) reduces stress-related psychological distress in healthcare professionals. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 13(2), 897–905. doi:10.1017/S1138741600002547. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asuero AM, Rodríguez Blanco T, Pujol Ribera E, et al. (2013) Evaluación de la efectividad de un programa de mindfulness en profesionales de atención primaria. Gaceta Sanitaria 27(6), 521–528. doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2013.04.007. - DOI - PubMed