Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;7(5):554-565.
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00888-z. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Charting the genomic landscape of seed-free plants

Affiliations
Review

Charting the genomic landscape of seed-free plants

Péter Szövényi et al. Nat Plants. 2021 May.

Abstract

During the past few years several high-quality genomes has been published from Charophyte algae, bryophytes, lycophytes and ferns. These genomes have not only elucidated the origin and evolution of early land plants, but have also provided important insights into the biology of the seed-free lineages. However, critical gaps across the phylogeny remain and many new questions have been raised through comparing seed-free and seed plant genomes. Here, we review the reference genomes available and identify those that are missing in the seed-free lineages. We compare patterns of various levels of genome and epigenomic organization found in seed-free plants to those of seed plants. Some genomic features appear to be fundamentally different. For instance, hornworts, Selaginella and most liverworts are devoid of whole-genome duplication, in stark contrast to other land plants. In addition, the distribution of genes and repeats appear to be less structured in seed-free genomes than in other plants, and the levels of gene body methylation appear to be much lower. Finally, we highlight the currently available (or needed) model systems, which are crucial to further our understanding about how changes in genes translate into evolutionary novelties.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wickett, N. J. et al. Phylotranscriptomic analysis of the origin and early diversification of land plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E4859–E4868 (2014). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Puttick, M. N. et al. The interrelationships of land plants and the nature of the ancestral embryophyte. Curr. Biol. 28, 733–745 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. de Sousa, F., Foster, P. G., Donoghue, P. C. J., Schneider, H. & Cox, C. J. Nuclear protein phylogenies support the monophyly of the three bryophyte groups (Bryophyta Schimp.). New Phytol. 222, 565–575 (2019). - PubMed - DOI
    1. One Thousand Plant Transcriptomes Initiative. One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature 574, 679–685 (2019). - DOI
    1. Harris, B. J., Harrison, C. J., Hetherington, A. M. & Williams, T. A. Phylogenomic evidence for the monophyly of bryophytes and the reductive evolution of stomata. Curr. Biol. 30, 2001–2012 (2020). - PubMed - DOI

LinkOut - more resources