Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID-19 lockdown
- PMID: 33822454
- PMCID: PMC8250330
- DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12524
Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID-19 lockdown
Abstract
Objective: Habits, defined as well-learned associations between cues and behaviours, are essential for health-related behaviours, including physical activity (PA). Despite the sensitivity of habits to context changes, little remains known about the influence of a context change on the interplay between PA habits and behaviours. We investigated the evolution of PA habits amidst the spring COVID-19 lockdown, a major context change. Moreover, we examined the association of PA behaviours and autonomous motivation with this evolution.
Design: Three-wave observational longitudinal design.
Methods: PA habits, behaviours, and autonomous motivation were collected through online surveys in 283 French and Swiss participants. Variables were self-reported with reference to three time-points: before-, mid-, and end-lockdown.
Results: Mixed effect modelling revealed a decrease in PA habits from before- to mid-lockdown, especially among individuals with strong before-lockdown habits. Path analysis showed that before-lockdown PA habits were not associated with mid-lockdown PA behaviours (β = -.02, p = .837), while mid-lockdown PA habits were positively related to end-lockdown PA behaviours (β = .23, p = .021). Autonomous motivation was directly associated with PA habits (ps < .001) and withto before- and mid-lockdown PA behaviours (ps < .001) (but not with end-lockdown PA behaviours) and did not moderate the relations between PA behaviours and habits (ps > .072).
Conclusion: PA habits were altered, and their influence on PA behaviours was impeded during the COVID-19 lockdown. Engagement in PA behaviours and autonomous motivation helped in counteracting PA habits disruption.
Keywords: COVID-19; autonomous motivation; context change; habits; physical activity.
© 2021 The British Psychological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures



References
-
- Bates, D. , Mächler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed‐effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Choice Reviews Online, 44(05), 44‐2769. 10.5860/CHOICE.44-2769 - DOI
-
- Brunet, J. , Gunnell, K. E. , Gaudreau, P. , & Sabiston, C. M. (2015). An integrative analytical framework for understanding the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 2–15. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.034 - DOI