Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;67(3-4):284-296.
doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

CBPR Implementation Framework for Community-Academic Partnerships

Affiliations

CBPR Implementation Framework for Community-Academic Partnerships

Victoria Sánchez et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The Engage for Equity (E2) study is an intervention trial for community-academic research partnerships that seeks to improve partnering practices and health equity outcomes by providing community and academic partners with tools to enhance and advance power sharing and health equity. Twenty-five community/academic research teams completed a two-day training intervention where they were introduced to the CBPR Conceptual Model and corresponding applied tools to their partnerships. We report on team interviews conducted immediately after the training, where teams discussed opportunities and challenges using the CBPR Model as an implementation framework as they considered their own contexts, their partnering processes/practices, actions, and their desired outcomes. We applied Diffusion of Innovation theory to guide data collection and analysis; augmented by intent to use and collective reflection. Results pointed to the flexibility of the CBPR model, concrete use of tools (e.g., planning/evaluation), and broader use in inspiring collective reflection to improve partnering practices and inform equity values. As an implementation framework, the CBPR model incorporates collaborative processes and strategies to mitigate power differentials into key phases of implementation studies, adding factors central to health equity work, not existing in previous implementation frameworks.

Keywords: CBPR model; Community-academic research partnerships; Health and social equity; Implementation framework; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Elaborating a CBPR World View: A Commentary.
    Trickett EJ. Trickett EJ. Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Jun;67(3-4):327-330. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12527. Epub 2021 Jul 27. Am J Community Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34313347 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen, J., Barr, D., Cochran, M., Greene, J., & Dean, C. (1989). Networking bulletin: Empowerment and family support (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Cornell Empowerment Group.
    1. Cargo, M., & Mercer, S.L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29(1), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.091307.083824
    1. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder and Herder.
    1. Friese, S. (2019). ATLAS.ti (Version 8) [Computer software]. SAGE Publications Limited.
    1. Himmelman, A.T. (2001). On coalitions and the transformation of power relations: Collaborative betterment and collaborative empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010334831330

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources