Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 7;59(8):1468-1476.
doi: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0182. Print 2021 Jul 27.

Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups

Affiliations
Free article

Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay evaluation using clinical samples from different testing groups

Giulia Menchinelli et al. Clin Chem Lab Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Compared to RT-PCR, lower performance of antigen detection assays, including the Lumipulse G SARS-CoV-2 Ag assay, may depend on specific testing scenarios.

Methods: We tested 594 nasopharyngeal swab samples from individuals with COVID-19 (RT-PCR cycle threshold [Ct] values ≤ 40) or non-COVID-19 (Ct values >40) diagnoses. RT-PCR positive samples were assigned to diagnostic, screening, or monitoring groups of testing.

Results: With a limit of detection of 1.2 × 104 SARS-CoV-2 RNA copies/mL, Lumipulse showed positive percent agreement (PPA) of 79.9% (155/194) and negative percent agreement of 99.3% (397/400), whereas PPAs were 100% for samples with Ct values of <18 or 18-<25 and 92.5% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30. By three groups, Lumipulse showed PPA of 87.0% (60/69), 81.1% (43/53), or 72.2% (52/72), respectively, whereas PPA was 100% for samples with Ct values of <18 or 18-<25, and was 94.4, 80.0, or 100% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30, respectively. Additional testing of RT-PCR positive samples for SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA showed that, by three groups, PPA was 63.8% (44/69), 62.3% (33/53), or 33.3% (24/72), respectively. PPAs dropped to 55.6, 20.0, or 41.7% for samples with Ct values of 25-<30, respectively. All 101 samples with a subgenomic RNA positive result had a Lumipulse assay's antigen positive result, whereas only 54 (58.1%) of remaining 93 samples had a Lumipulse assay's antigen positive result.

Conclusions: Lumipulse assay was highly sensitive in samples with low RT-PCR Ct values, implying repeated testing to reduce consequences of false-negative results.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antigen detection; lumipulse assay; nasopharyngeal swab; testing group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brooks, ZC, Das, S. COVID-19 testing. Am J Clin Pathol 2020;154:575–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa141.
    1. Cheng, MP, Papenburg, J, Desjardins, M, Kanjilal, S, Quach, C, Libman, M, et al.. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome–related coronavirus-2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med 2020:M20–1301.
    1. Mak, GC, Lau, SS, Wong, KK, Chow, NL, Lau, CS, Lam, ET, et al.. Analytical sensitivity and clinical sensitivity of the three rapid antigen detection kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus. J Clin Virol 2020;133:104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104684.
    1. Ogawa, T, Fukumori, T, Nishihara, Y, Sekine, T, Okuda, N, Nishimura, T, et al.. Another false-positive problem for a SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in Japan. J Clin Virol 2020;131:104612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104612.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Options for the use of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 in the EU/EEA and the UK. 19 November 2020. Stockholm: ECDC; 2020.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources