Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 6;19(1):59.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00703-3.

Implementation research training for learners in low- and middle-income countries: evaluating behaviour change after participating in a massive open online course

Pascal Launois  1 , Dermot Maher  1 , Edith Certain  1 , Bella Ross  2 , Michael J Penkunas  3
Affiliations

Implementation research training for learners in low- and middle-income countries: evaluating behaviour change after participating in a massive open online course

Pascal Launois et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Implementation research (IR) can play a critical role in the delivery of disease control interventions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The growing demand for IR training has led to the development of a range of training programmes and university courses, the majority of which can not be accessed by learners in LMICs. This article reports on the evaluation of the massive open online course (MOOC) developed by the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases hosted by WHO on the topic of IR with a focus on infectious diseases of poverty. This study followed the Kirkpatrick Model to evaluate training programmes with a specific focus on post-training changes in behaviour.

Methods: MOOC participants were invited to take part in an anonymous online survey examining their knowledge of IR and how they applied it in their professional practice approximately 1-1.5 years after completing their course. The survey contained 43 open-ended, multiple choice and Likert-type questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the quantitative data and responses to the open-ended questions were thematically coded.

Results: A total of 748 MOOC participants responded to the survey. The demographic profile of the survey respondents aligned with that of the MOOC participants, with nearly 70% of respondents originating from Africa. Responses to the quantitative and open-ended survey questions revealed that respondents' knowledge of IR had improved to a large extent as a result of the MOOC, and that they used the knowledge and skills gained in their professional lives frequently and had consequently changed their professional behaviour. Respondents most often cited the problem-solving aspect of IR as a substantial area of behavioral change influenced by participating in the MOOC.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that the MOOC was successful in targeting learners from LMICs, in strengthening their IR knowledge and contributing to their ability to apply it in their professional practice. The utility of MOOCs for providing IR training to learners in LMICs, where implementation challenges are encountered often, makes this platform an ideal standalone learning tool or one that could be combined with other training formats.

Keywords: Kirkpatrick model; Low- and middle-income countries; Massive open online course; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BR and MJP declare that they have no competing interests. PL, DM and EC work for TDR, which funded the development of the MOOC.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Countries of represented MOOC registrants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI. Implementation science. Science. 2007;318(5857):1728–1729. doi: 10.1126/science.1150009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sheikh K, Agyepong I, Jhalani M, Ammar W, Hafeez A, Pyakuryal S, et al. Learning health systems: an empowering agenda for low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2000;395(10223):476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)33134-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
    1. Carlfjord S, Roback K, Nilsen P. Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambers DA, Proctor EK, Brownson RC, Straus SE. Mapping training needs for dissemination and implementation research: lessons from a synthesis of existing DI research training programs. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):593–601. doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0399-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources