Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients
- PMID: 3382566
- PMCID: PMC1276895
- DOI: 10.1136/hrt.59.5.551
Limitations in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler gradients
Abstract
Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography was performed before cardiac catheterisation in 69 consecutive patients with suspected aortic stenosis. Agreement between the maximum and the mean Doppler gradients and catheterisation gradients was good. Doppler echocardiography, however, systematically underestimated the maximum and mean gradients, particularly in the high range. Stepwise regression analysis of the small pressure difference between the two methods showed that it could not be explained by age, sex, stroke volume, differences in heart rate, ejection fraction, the presence of coronary artery disease, or severity of aortic regurgitation. There was a negative curvilinear correlation between the maximum and mean Doppler gradients and the aortic valve areas that were measured at catheterisation in patients with pure aortic stenosis. The degree of correlation decreased when patients with concomitant aortic regurgitation were included. The scatter of gradients above and below the correlation line was large and this was caused by low and high transvalvar flow. These results show that the usefulness of Doppler gradients for judging the severity of aortic stenosis, both in relation to immediate diagnosis and follow up, is severely limited if transvalvar flow is not taken into account.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods with heart catheterisation in assessing aortic valve area in 100 patients with aortic stenosis.Br Heart J. 1995 Mar;73(3):293-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.3.293. Br Heart J. 1995. PMID: 7727193 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography.Indian Heart J. 1990 Sep-Oct;42(5):371-4. Indian Heart J. 1990. PMID: 2086443
-
Catheterization-Doppler discrepancies in nonsimultaneous evaluations of aortic stenosis.Echocardiography. 2005 May;22(5):367-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2005.04006.x. Echocardiography. 2005. PMID: 15901286
-
[Quantification of valvular stenosis by Doppler echography].Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1990 May;83(6):839-52. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1990. PMID: 2114841 Review. French.
-
Aortic valve stenosis: to the gradient and beyond--the mismatch between area and gradient severity.J Interv Cardiol. 2013 Apr;26(2):183-94. doi: 10.1111/joic.12004. Epub 2012 Dec 30. J Interv Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23278313 Review.
Cited by
-
Doppler echocardiography in elderly patients with ejection systolic murmurs.Postgrad Med J. 1991 Dec;67(794):1059-61. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.67.794.1059. Postgrad Med J. 1991. PMID: 1800964 Free PMC article.
-
The prevalence of aortic stenosis in the elderly in Iceland and predictions for the coming decades: the AGES-Reykjavík study.Int J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 20;176(3):916-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.08.053. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Int J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25171970 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Management of asymptomatic aortic stenosis: masterly inactivity but cat-like observation.Heart. 1997 Sep;78(3):215-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.78.3.215. Heart. 1997. PMID: 9391278 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis.Br Heart J. 1989 Nov;62(5):372-8. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.5.372. Br Heart J. 1989. PMID: 2531603 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality.Int J Card Imaging. 1995 Jun;11(2):97-104. doi: 10.1007/BF01844707. Int J Card Imaging. 1995. PMID: 7673764 Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources