Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;50(5):999-1008.
doi: 10.1111/vsu.13634. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Timing of and risk factors for deep surgical site infection requiring implant removal following canine tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

Affiliations

Timing of and risk factors for deep surgical site infection requiring implant removal following canine tibial plateau leveling osteotomy

Renee A McDougall et al. Vet Surg. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To identify demographic risk factors for deep surgical site infection (SSI) requiring tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) implant removal and time to implant removal.

Animals: Four hundred and thirty-three dogs that underwent a TPLO (144 that developed a deep SSI and required implant removal, 289 that did not).

Study design: Retrospective case-control study.

Methods: Records of dogs undergoing implant removal due to a deep SSI after TPLO between 2006 and 2018 at two referral centers were reviewed. These records were frequency-matched by date to dogs undergoing TPLO that did not require implant removal. Multivariable analyses tested associations between demographics and implant removal as well as timing of implant removal.

Results: Deep SSI and implant removal occurred in 144 of 4813 (3.0%; 95% CI: 2.5, 3.5) dogs treated with TPLO. Implant removal was performed at a median of 279 days (range 49-2394 days) postoperatively. Male dogs (OR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.2, 2.7) and German Shepherd dogs (GSDs) (OR 7.4; 95% CI: 2.6, 20.5) were associated with plate removal. Earlier TPLO plate removal was associated with GSDs only (HR 2.4; 95% CI: 1.4, 4.1).

Conclusion: Implant removal due to SSI after TPLO was uncommon, although male dogs and GSDs seemed predisposed to this complication.

Significance: These demographic risk factors can be used to educate owners regarding perioperative management.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hayashi K, Manley PA, Muir P. Cranial cruciate ligament pathophysiology in dogs with cruciate disease: a review. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004;40:385-390.
    1. Slocum B, Devine-Slocum T. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. In: Bojrab MJ, ed. Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1998:1209-1215.
    1. Kim SE, Pozzi A, Kowaleski MP, Lewis DD. Tibial osteotomies for cranial cruciate ligament insufficiency in dogs. Vet Surg. 2008;37:111-125.
    1. Pacchiana PD, Morris E, Gillings SL, Jessen CR, Lipowitz AJ. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament rupture: 397 cases (1998-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:184-193.
    1. Priddy NH, Tomlinson JL, Dodam JR, Hornbostel JE. Complications with and owner assessment of the outcome of tibial plateau leveling osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 193 cases (1997-2001). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003;222:1726-1732.

LinkOut - more resources