Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 14;60(25):13835-13839.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202101771. Epub 2021 May 11.

Ce=O Terminated CeO2

Affiliations

Ce=O Terminated CeO2

David C Grinter et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

Multiply bonded lanthanide oxo groups are rare in coordination compounds and have not previously been reported for a surface termination of a lanthanide oxide. Here we report the observation of a Ce=O terminated ceria surface in a CeO2 (111)-( 3 × 3 )R30° reconstruction of ≈3 nm thick ceria islands prepared on Pt(111). This is evidenced by scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM), low energy electron diffraction (LEED) and high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HREELS) measurements in conjunction with density functional theory (DFT) calculations. A Ce=O stretching frequency of 775 cm-1 is observed in HREELS, compared with 766 cm-1 calculated by DFT. The calculations also predict that the Ce=O bond is weak, with an oxygen vacancy formation energy of 0.85 eV. This could play an important role in the facile removal of lattice oxygen from CeO2 , accompanied by the reduction of CeIV to CeIII , which is a key attribute of ceria-based systems in connection with their unique catalytic properties.

Keywords: cerium dioxide; density functional calculations; heterogeneous catalysis; multiple bonds; scanning tunnelling microscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
STM images of CeO2(111)‐(3 ×3 )R30° islands. a) Large‐area STM image of ceria islands on Pt(111) (200×200 nm2). b) Filled‐states STM image of a ceria island (25×25 nm2), c) Magnified image of (b) of the atomically resolved reconstructed surface (15×15 nm2). d) Histogram of the average island heights in (a) with a bin width of 0.1 nm. e) Line profile corresponding to the white line in (c). (V s=−4.4 V, I t=10 pA.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Experimental and DFT‐simulated STM images of the CeO2(111)‐(3 ×3 )R30° reconstructed surface. a) Empty states; V=+1.7 V. b) Filled states; V=−4 V, recorded by dual mode imaging. The DFT calculations are based on the models shown, in which the larger spheres are Ce and the smaller are O. The Ce=O bond is formed by a green Ce and dark blue O. The red triangle denotes a threefold position where there is a Ce atom surrounded by Ce=O species. c) The right panel shows the superposition of the marked protrusions in the empty (Ce) and filled states (O and Ovac) images.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Top and side views of the proposed Ce=O termination of CeO2(111)‐(3 ×3 )R30°. The larger spheres are Ce and the smaller are O. The Ce=O bond is between the green Ce to blue O, with a calculated bond distance of 1.89 Å. The inequivalent O atoms in the outermost three oxygen layers are denoted A (Ce=O in TL1), B (TL1) and C–E (TL2).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calculated IR spectra for the Ce=O‐terminated (3 ×3 )R30°‐reconstructed and (1×1) unreconstructed CeO2(111) surfaces. The model for the Ce=O‐terminated (3 ×3 )R30° surface is the same as that in Figure 3. The 478 cm−1 mode observed for both is ascribed to vibrations against the fixed layer of the DFT slab. [22]
Figure 5
Figure 5
HREEL spectra of CeO2(111): a) area of the sample with the (3 ×3 )R30° surface reconstruction. b) A (1×1) area of the same sample following irradiation by the LEED electron beam. c) A native CeO2(111) film with (1×1) termination. Inset: magnified views of the 300–2300 cm−1 regions.

References

    1. Rodriguez J. A., Grinter D. C., Liu Z., Palomino R. M., Senanayake S. D., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 46, 1724–1841. - PubMed
    1. Liu Z., Huang E., Orozco I., Liao W., Palomino R. M., Rui N., Duchon T., Nemšák S., Grinter D. C., Mahapatra M., Liu P., Rodriguez J. A., Senanayake S. D., Science 2020, 368, 513–517. - PubMed
    1. Montini T., Melchionna M., Monai M., Fornasiero P., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 5987–6014. - PubMed
    1. Mao Z., Lustemberg P., Rumptz J. R., Ganduglia-Pirovano M. V., Campbell C. T., ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 5101–5114.
    1. Esch F., Fabris S., Zhou L., Montini T., Africh C., Fornasiero P., Comelli G., Rosei R., Science 2005, 309, 752–755. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources