Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Apr 8;49(7):818-829.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0505. Print 2021 Sep 27.

Analysis of cesarean section rates in two German hospitals applying the 10-Group Classification System

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

Analysis of cesarean section rates in two German hospitals applying the 10-Group Classification System

Christina Pulvermacher et al. J Perinat Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: In Germany, cesarean section (CS) rates more than doubled within the past two decades. For analysis, auditing and inter-hospital comparison, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) is recommended. We used the TGCS to analyze CS rates in two German hospitals of different levels of care.

Methods: From October 2017 to September 2018, data were prospectively collected. Unit A is a level three university hospital, unit B a level one district hospital. The German birth registry was used for comparison with national data. We performed two-sample Z tests and bootstrapping to compare aggregated (unit A + B) with national data and unit A with unit B.

Results: In both datasets (national data and aggregated data unit A + B), Robson group (RG) 5 was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate. Compared to national data, group sizes in RG 1 and 3 were significantly smaller in the units under investigation, RG 8 and 10 significantly larger. Total CS rates between the two units differed (40.7 vs. 28.4%, p<0.001). The CS rate in RG 5 and RG 10 was different (p<0.01 for both). The most relative frequent RG in both units consisted of group 5, followed by group 10 and 2a.

Conclusions: The analysis allowed us to explain different CS rates with differences in the study population and with differences in the clinical practice. These results serve as a starting point for audits, inter-hospital comparisons and for interventions aiming to reduce CS rates.

Keywords: 10-Group Classification System; Robson classification; TGCS; audit; cesarean section rates; cesarean section statistics; cesarean section trends; delivery; health care; quality indicators.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Statistisches, Bundesamt. Krankenhausentbindungen in Deutschland [Internet]. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Kranken... [Accessed 26 Sep 2020].
    1. Betrán, AP, Ye, J, Moller, A-B, Zhang, J, Gülmezoglu, AM, Torloni, MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PloS One 2016;11:e0148343. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.
    1. Boerma, T, Ronsmans, C, Melesse, DY, Barros, AJD, Barros, FC, Juan, L, et al.. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018;392:1341–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
    1. Statistisches, Bundesamt. 30.5% der Krankenhausentbindungen per Kaiserschnitt im Jahr 2017 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2018/09/PD18_349_23... [Accessed 21 Oct 2020].
    1. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436–7.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources