Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May;59(5):571-581.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00627-3. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

A guide to peer reviewing for Spinal Cord

Marcel P Dijkers  1
Affiliations
Review

A guide to peer reviewing for Spinal Cord

Marcel P Dijkers. Spinal Cord. 2021 May.

Abstract

Peer reviewing is a key mechanism underlying science publishing, but during their graduate training clinicians and researchers are unlikely to be taught the skill. This paper sets forth the art of peer reviewing in general, and the types of reviews that are most useful to the Editors of Spinal Cord (SC). The topics addressed are: the SC editorial process; the role of the referee; review process steps; the content and language of a review; and resources available to peer reviewers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Kronick DA. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA. 1990;263:1321–2. - DOI
    1. Del Mar C, Hoffmann TC. A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015;13:248. - DOI
    1. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Manuscript rejection: How to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer. Plast Reconstr Surgery. 2014;133:958–64. - DOI
    1. Moher D. Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2015;13:274. - DOI
    1. Lippi G, How, do I. peer-review a scientific article? A personal perspective. Annals of translational medicine. 2018;6:68. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources