Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar 22:12:605937.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.605937. eCollection 2021.

Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems

Affiliations
Review

Commercial Release of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Interface Between Biosafety Regulatory Systems and Varietal Release Systems

Olalekan Akinbo et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

African countries face key challenges in the deployment of GM crops due to incongruities in the processes for effective and efficient commercial release while simultaneously ensuring food and environmental safety. Against the backdrop of the preceding scenario, and for the effective and efficient commercial release of GM crops for cultivation by farmers, while simultaneously ensuring food and environmental safety, there is a need for the close collaboration of and the interplay between the biosafety competent authorities and the variety release authorities. The commercial release of genetically modified (GM) crops for cultivation requires the approval of biosafety regulatory packages. The evaluation and approval of lead events fall under the jurisdiction of competent national authorities for biosafety (which may be ministries, autonomous authorities, or agencies). The evaluation of lead events fundamentally comprises a review of environmental, food, and feed safety data as provided for in the Biosafety Acts, implementing regulations, and, in some cases, the involvement of other relevant legal instruments. Although the lead GM event may be commercially released for farmers to cultivate, it is often introgressed into locally adapted and farmer preferred non-GM cultivars that are already released and grown by the farmers. The introduction of new biotechnology products to farmers is a process that includes comprehensive testing in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field over some time. The process provides answers to questions about the safety of the products before being introduced into the environment and marketplace. This is the first step in regulatory approvals. The output of the research and development phase of the product development cycle is the identification of a safe and best performing event for advancement to regulatory testing, likely commercialization, and general release. The process of the commercial release of new crop varieties in countries with established formal seed systems is guided by well-defined procedures and approval systems and regulated by the Seed Acts and implemented regulations. In countries with seed laws, no crop varieties are approved for commercial cultivation prior to the fulfillment of the national performance trials and the distinctness, uniformity, and stability tests, as well as prior to the approval by the National Variety Release Committee. This review outlines key challenges faced by African countries in the deployment of GM crops and cites lessons learned as well as best practices from countries that have successfully commercialized genetically engineered crops.

Keywords: Africa; GMOs (genetically modified organisms); biosafety; seed regulations; variety registration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Biotechnology proof of concept, product development, and commercialization continuum and biosafety regulatory considerations.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
African Countries Status with Commercialized Biotechnology Crops.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The pathway of the development of regulatory approval and commercial release of the genetically modified seeds.

References

    1. ABNE (2019). ABNE in Africa, Towards Building Functional Biosafety Systems in Africa. Available online at: http://nepad-abne.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ABNE-in-Africa-2019_fin... (accessed January 2, 2020).
    1. Alhassan W. S., Bissi P. (2006). Program for Africa’s Seed Systems (PASS). Ghana: Rockefeller Foundation, 81. (accessed February 18, 2021).
    1. Alemu D., Spielman D. J. (2006). The Ethiopian Seed System: Regulations, Institutions and Stakeholders Paper submitted for ESSP Policy Conference 2006 “Bridging, Balancing, and Scaling up: Advancing the Rural Growth Agenda in Ethiopia” 6–8 June 2006, Addis Ababa. Available online at: https://www.future-agricultures.org/wp-content (accessed February 19, 2021).
    1. Anon (2019). Mozambique- Access to Seed index. Available online at: https://www.accesstoseeds.org/index/eastern-southern-africa/country-prof... (accessed July 23, 2020).
    1. ASARECA (2004). Harmonizing Seed Laws and Policies in Eastern Africa, Experiences and Lessons Learned. Available online at: https://stak.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ECAPAPA_monograph_6.pdf (accessed February 18, 2021).

LinkOut - more resources