Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 3:11:04023.
doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04023.

The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Affiliations

The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

W Tyler Winders et al. J Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: In resource-constrained settings, mobile health (mHealth) has varied applications. While there is strong evidence for its use in chronic disease management, the applications of mHealth for management of acute illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not as well described. This review systematically explores current available evidence on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions at improving health outcomes in emergency care settings in LMICs.

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing seven electronic databases and manual searches to identify peer-reviewed literature containing each of three search elements: mHealth, emergency care (EC), and LMICs. Articles quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.

Results: After removing duplicates, 6498 studies met initial search criteria; 108 were eligible for full text review and 46 met criteria for inclusion. Thirty-six pertained to routine emergency care, and 10 involved complex humanitarian emergencies. Based on the GRADE criteria, 15 studies were rated as "Very Low" quality, 24 as "Low" quality, 6 as "Moderate" quality, and 1 as "High" quality. Eight studied data collection, 9 studied decision support, 15 studied direct patient care, and 14 studied health training. All 46 studies reported positive impacts of mHealth on EC in LMICs.

Conclusions: Mobile health interventions can be effective in improving provider-focused and patient-centered outcomes in both routine and complex EC settings. Future investigations focusing on patient-centered outcomes are needed to further validate these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.

References

    1. Kay M, Santos J, Takane M. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
    1. Bastawrous A, Armstrong MJ.Mobile health use in low- and high-income countries: an overview of the peer-reviewed literature. J R Soc Med. 2013;106:130-42. 10.1177/0141076812472620 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Finitsis DJ, Pellowski JA, Johnson BT.Text message intervention designs to promote adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88166. 10.1371/journal.pone.0088166 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devi BR, Syed-Abdul S, Kumar A, Iqbal U, Nguyen PA, Li YC, et al. mHealth: An updated systematic review with a focus on HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis long term management using mobile phones. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2015;122:257-65. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gurman TA, Rubin SE, Roess AA.Effectiveness of mHealth behavior change communication interventions in developing countries: a systematic review of the literature. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 1:82-104. 10.1080/10810730.2011.649160 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources