Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 18:2:3.
doi: 10.1186/s42522-020-0010-1. eCollection 2020.

Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data

Affiliations
Review

Typing methods based on whole genome sequencing data

Laura Uelze et al. One Health Outlook. .

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) of foodborne pathogens has become an effective method for investigating the information contained in the genome sequence of bacterial pathogens. In addition, its highly discriminative power enables the comparison of genetic relatedness between bacteria even on a sub-species level. For this reason, WGS is being implemented worldwide and across sectors (human, veterinary, food, and environment) for the investigation of disease outbreaks, source attribution, and improved risk characterization models. In order to extract relevant information from the large quantity and complex data produced by WGS, a host of bioinformatics tools has been developed, allowing users to analyze and interpret sequencing data, starting from simple gene-searches to complex phylogenetic studies. Depending on the research question, the complexity of the dataset and their bioinformatics skill set, users can choose between a great variety of tools for the analysis of WGS data. In this review, we describe the relevant approaches for phylogenomic studies for outbreak studies and give an overview of selected tools for the characterization of foodborne pathogens based on WGS data. Despite the efforts of the last years, harmonization and standardization of typing tools are still urgently needed to allow for an easy comparison of data between laboratories, moving towards a one health worldwide surveillance system for foodborne pathogens.

Keywords: Bioinformatics tools; Comparison; Methods; Typing; Whole genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsAll authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Wheel of tools and supported methods. Provided methods: Antimicrobial resistance gene detection (AMR), Virulence factor search (Virulence), Serotyping and Phylogeny (highlighted in black/grey) by selected tools (BIGSdb, Bionumerics, CGE, COMPARE, PATRIC, EnteroBase, INNUENDO, IRIDA, NCBI Pathogens, PathogenWatch and SeqSphere). Organisms for which a methodology is supported by a tool are specified. For phylogeny, the underlying methods are mentioned. White fields indicate that functionality is not supported by the respective platform. ML = Maximum Likelihood

References

    1. Rossello-Mora R, Amann R. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001;25(1):39–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hood AM. Phage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Hyg. 1953;51(1):1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400015448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature. 1953;171(4356):737–738. doi: 10.1038/171737a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tenover FC. Plasmid fingerprinting. A tool for bacterial strain identification and surveillance of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Clin Lab Med. 1985;5(3):413–436. doi: 10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30850-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerner-Smidt P, Hise K, Kincaid J, Hunter S, Rolando S, Hyytia-Trees E, et al. PulseNet USA: a five-year update. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006;3(1):9–19. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources