Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;47(3):474-479.
doi: 10.1111/aej.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Clinical comparison of sensitivity and specificity between sensibility and vitality tests in determining the pulp vitality of mandibular premolars

Aidin Farughi  1 , Armita Rouhani  1 , Reza Shahmohammadi  2 , Hamid Jafarzadeh  1
Affiliations

Clinical comparison of sensitivity and specificity between sensibility and vitality tests in determining the pulp vitality of mandibular premolars

Aidin Farughi et al. Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

This clinical study was designed to compare cold pulp testing (CPT), heat pulp testing (HPT) and electric pulp test (EPT) with pulse oximetry (PO), flowmetry (FM) and thermometry (TM) in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Twenty premolar teeth in need of root canal treatment were included in the study. Pulp sensibility tests (CPT, HPT and EPT) along with vitality tests (PO, FM and TM) were performed. As the gold standard, the teeth were endodontically treated and pulp vitality was determined by direct visual observation. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values for each test were as follows: HPT 1, 1, 100%; CPT 1, 0.818, 90%; EPT 1, 0.909, 95%; PO 1, 0.545, 75%; TM 0.111, 0.272, 20%; and FM 0.444, 0.272, 35%, respectively. The most accurate test among all was HPT. PO was the most accurate vitality test.

Keywords: flowmetry; pulp test; pulp vitality; pulse oximetry; thermometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Jespersen JJ, Hellstein J, Williamson A, Johnson WT, Qian F. Evaluation of dental pulp sensibility tests in a clinical setting. J Endod 2014; 40: 351-4.
    1. Gopikrishna V, Tinagupta K, Kandaswamy D. Evaluation of efficacy of a new custom-made pulse oximeter dental probe in comparison with the electrical and thermal tests for assessing pulp vitality. J Endod 2007; 33: 411-4.
    1. Bhaskar SN, Rappaport HM. Dental vitality tests and pulp status. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 86: 409-11.
    1. Chambers IG. The role and methods of pulp testing in oral diagnosis: a review. Int Endod J 1982; 15: 1-15.
    1. Evans D, Reid J, Strang R, Stirrups D. A comparison of laser Doppler flowmetry with other methods of assessing the vitality of traumatised anterior teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999; 15: 284-90.

LinkOut - more resources