The SANTÉ study at 10 years of follow-up: Effectiveness, safety, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy
- PMID: 33830503
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.16895
The SANTÉ study at 10 years of follow-up: Effectiveness, safety, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of deep brain anterior thalamus stimulation after 7 and 10 years, and report the incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and overall mortality in adults in the Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy (SANTÉ) study.
Methods: After the 3-month blinded and 9-month unblinded phases, subjects continued to be assessed during long-term follow-up (LTFU) and later a continued therapy access phase (CAP), to further characterize adverse events and the incidence of SUDEP. Stimulus parameter and medication changes were allowed.
Results: One hundred ten implanted subjects accumulated a total of 938 device-years of experience (69 subjects during the LTFU phase and 61 subjects in the CAP phase). Prior to study closure, 57 active subjects continued therapy at 14 study centers, with follow-up of at least 10 (maximum 14) years. At 7 years, median seizure frequency percent reduction from baseline was 75% (p < .001), with no outcome differences related to prior vagus nerve stimulation or resective surgery. The most severe seizure type, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic, was reduced by 71%. Adding new antiseizure medications did not impact the pattern of seizure reduction over time. There were no unanticipated serious adverse events in the study. The definite-plus-probable SUDEP rate, based on SANTÉ study experience (two deaths in 938 years) and previous pilot studies (0 deaths in 76 years), indicated a rate of 2.0 deaths for 1000 person-years. Overall mortality was 6.9 deaths per 1000 person-years.
Significance: The long-term efficacy and safety profiles of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) system for epilepsy are favorable and demonstrate stable outcomes. Improvement in frequency of the most severe seizure type may reduce SUDEP risk. The SUDEP rate with DBS (2.0) is comparable to other neuromodulation treatments (i.e., vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation) for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
Keywords: brain stimulation; focal seizures; neuromodulation; sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.
© 2021 International League Against Epilepsy.
Comment in
-
Response: Deep brain stimulation targets in epilepsy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of anterior and centromedian thalamic nuclei and hippocampus.Epilepsia. 2022 Jul;63(7):1885-1886. doi: 10.1111/epi.17272. Epub 2022 May 16. Epilepsia. 2022. PMID: 35514031 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Long-term evaluation of anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in the European MORE registry.Epilepsia. 2024 Aug;65(8):2438-2458. doi: 10.1111/epi.18003. Epub 2024 Jun 5. Epilepsia. 2024. PMID: 38837755
-
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy during cenobamate clinical development.Epilepsia. 2023 Aug;64(8):2108-2115. doi: 10.1111/epi.17662. Epub 2023 Jun 5. Epilepsia. 2023. PMID: 37219391
-
Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy.Neurology. 2020 Sep 1;95(9):e1244-e1256. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010154. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Neurology. 2020. PMID: 32690786 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcome in neurostimulation of epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Feb;91:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 30. Epilepsy Behav. 2019. PMID: 30929666 Review.
-
Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation.Epilepsia. 2022 Oct;63(10):2445-2460. doi: 10.1111/epi.17329. Epub 2022 Aug 9. Epilepsia. 2022. PMID: 35700144 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The comparison of DBS and RNS for adult drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jun 19;18:1429223. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1429223. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38962148 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of anterior thalamic nuclei stimulation on hippocampal activity: Chronic recording in a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021 Jun 30;16:100467. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100467. eCollection 2021. Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2021. PMID: 34458713 Free PMC article.
-
Stereo-electroencephalography in the setting of a preexisting deep brain stimulation device: illustrative case.J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025 Apr 28;9(17):CASE24854. doi: 10.3171/CASE24854. Print 2025 Apr 28. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2025. PMID: 40294526 Free PMC article.
-
Invasive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Epilepsy.Semin Neurol. 2025 Apr;45(2):252-263. doi: 10.1055/a-2562-1964. Epub 2025 Mar 19. Semin Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40107299 Review.
-
Pregnancy Outcomes in Epilepsy Patients Treated with Neuromodulating Devices.Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s11910-025-01441-7. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40689941 Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Engel J Jr. What can we do for people with drug-resistant epilepsy? Neurology. 2016;87:2483-9.
-
- Harden C, Tomson T, Gloss D, Buchhalter J, Cross JH, Donner E, et al. Practice guideline summary: sudden unexpected death in epilepsy incidence rates and risk factors: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Neurology. 2017;88:1674-80.
-
- Wiebe S, Blume WT, Girvin JP, Eliasziw M. A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:311-8.
-
- Engel J Jr, McDermott MP, Wiebe S, Langfitt JT, Stern JM, Dewar S, et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012;307:922-30.
-
- Sperling MR, Feldman H, Kinman J, Liporace JD, O'Connor MJ. Seizure control and mortality in epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:45-50.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous