Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;5(6):836-844.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01432-0. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets

Louise Mair  1 Leon A Bennun  2   3 Thomas M Brooks  4   5   6 Stuart H M Butchart  3   7 Friederike C Bolam  8   9 Neil D Burgess  9   10 Jonathan M M Ekstrom  2 E J Milner-Gulland  11 Michael Hoffmann  12 Keping Ma  13 Nicholas B W Macfarlane  14 Domitilla C Raimondo  15   16 Ana S L Rodrigues  17 Xiaoli Shen  13 Bernardo B N Strassburg  18   19 Craig R Beatty  14   20 Carla Gómez-Creutzberg  21 Alvaro Iribarrem  18   19 Meizani Irmadhiany  22 Eduardo Lacerda  19   23 Bianca C Mattos  24 Karmila Parakkasi  22 Marcelo F Tognelli  25   26 Elizabeth L Bennett  27 Catherine Bryan  28 Giulia Carbone  4 Abhishek Chaudhary  29 Maxime Eiselin  30 Gustavo A B da Fonseca  31 Russell Galt  32 Arne Geschke  33 Louise Glew  20 Romie Goedicke  30 Jonathan M H Green  34 Richard D Gregory  35   36 Samantha L L Hill  9 David G Hole  25 Jonathan Hughes  9 Jonathan Hutton  37 Marco P W Keijzer  30 Laetitia M Navarro  38   39 Eimear Nic Lughadha  40 Andrew J Plumptre  3   41 Philippe Puydarrieux  4 Hugh P Possingham  42   43 Aleksandar Rankovic  44 Eugenie C Regan  9   45 Carlo Rondinini  46 Joshua D Schneck  14 Juha Siikamäki  14 Cyriaque Sendashonga  4 Gilles Seutin  47 Sam Sinclair  48 Andrew L Skowno  15   49 Carolina A Soto-Navarro  9   37 Simon N Stuart  28   50   51 Helen J Temple  2 Antoine Vallier  52 Francesca Verones  53 Leonardo R Viana  25   54 James Watson  27   43 Simeon Bezeng  55   56 Monika Böhm  12 Ian J Burfield  7 Viola Clausnitzer  57 Colin Clubbe  40 Neil A Cox  25   26 Jörg Freyhof  58 Leah R Gerber  59 Craig Hilton-Taylor  32 Richard Jenkins  32 Ackbar Joolia  32 Lucas N Joppa  60 Lian Pin Koh  61 Thomas E Lacher Jr  62   63 Penny F Langhammer  63   64 Barney Long  63 David Mallon  65 Michela Pacifici  46 Beth A Polidoro  59   66 Caroline M Pollock  32 Malin C Rivers  67 Nicolette S Roach  62   63 Jon Paul Rodríguez  68   69   70 Jane Smart  4 Bruce E Young  71 Frank Hawkins  14 Philip J K McGowan  8
Affiliations

A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets

Louise Mair et al. Nat Ecol Evol. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

The Convention on Biological Diversity's post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework will probably include a goal to stabilize and restore the status of species. Its delivery would be facilitated by making the actions required to halt and reverse species loss spatially explicit. Here, we develop a species threat abatement and restoration (STAR) metric that is scalable across species, threats and geographies. STAR quantifies the contributions that abating threats and restoring habitats in specific places offer towards reducing extinction risk. While every nation can contribute towards halting biodiversity loss, Indonesia, Colombia, Mexico, Madagascar and Brazil combined have stewardship over 31% of total STAR values for terrestrial amphibians, birds and mammals. Among actions, sustainable crop production and forestry dominate, contributing 41% of total STAR values for these taxonomic groups. Key Biodiversity Areas cover 9% of the terrestrial surface but capture 47% of STAR values. STAR could support governmental and non-state actors in quantifying their contributions to meeting science-based species targets within the framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010). - DOI
    1. Butchart, S. H. M. et al. in Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Ch. 3 (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).
    1. Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2020).
    1. Rounsevell, M. D. A. et al. A biodiversity target based on species extinctions. Science 368, 1193–1195 (2020). - DOI
    1. Marques, A. et al. A framework to identify enabling and urgent actions for the 2020 Aichi Targets. Basic Appl. Ecol. 15, 633–638 (2014). - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources