Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 23:12:638904.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.638904. eCollection 2021.

Effects of Lower Limb Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations

Effects of Lower Limb Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in People With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Auwal Abdullahi et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) is effective at improving upper limb outcomes after stroke. Aim: The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of lower limb CIMT studies of any design in people with stroke. Materials/ Method: PubMED, PEDro, OTSeeker, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from their earliest dates to February 2021. Lower limbs CIMT studies that measured outcomes at baseline and post-intervention were selected. Sample size, mean, and standard deviation on the outcomes of interest and the protocols of both the experimental and control groups were extracted. McMaster Critical Review Form was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Result: Sixteen studies with different designs were included in this review. The result showed that lower limb CIMT improves functional, physiological and person's reported outcomes including motor function, balance, mobility, gait speed, oxygen uptake, exertion before and after commencement of activities, knee extensor spasticity, weight bearing, lower limb kinematics and quality of life in people with stroke post intervention. However, there were only significant differences in quality of life in favor of CIMT post-intervention [mean difference (MD) = 16.20, 95% CI = 3.30-29.10, p = 0.01]; and at follow-up [mean difference (MD) = 14.10, 95% CI = 2.07-26.13, p = 0.02] between CIMT and the control group. Even for the quality of life, there was significant heterogeneity in the studies post intervention (I 2 = 84%, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Lower limb CIMT improves motor function, balance, functional mobility, gait speed, oxygen uptake, weigh bearing, lower limb kinematics, and quality of life. However, it is only superior to the control at improving quality of life after stroke based on the current literature.

Keywords: activities of daily living; constraint induced movement therapy; lower extremity; quality of life; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Study flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Motor function post-intervention.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Balance post-intervention. (B) Balance at follow up.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) Functional mobility post-intervention. (B) Functional mobility follow up.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Gait speed post-intervention. (B) Gait speed at follow up.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Quality of life post-intervention. (B) Quality of life at follow up.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Risk of bias of the included RCTs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ostendorf CG, Wolf SL. Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. Phys Ther. (1981) 61:1022–8. 10.1093/ptj/61.7.1022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taub E, Berman AJ. Avoidance conditioning in the absence of relevant proprioceptive and exteroceptive feedback. J Comp Physiol Psychol. (1963) 56:1012–6. 10.1037/h0048315 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. (2008) 39:1520–25. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502229 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massie C, Malcolm MP, Greene D, Thaut M. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2009) 90:571–9. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.574 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunningham DA, Varnerin N, Machado A, Bonnetta C, Janini D, Roelle S. Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: a proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. Restor Neurol Neurosci. (2015) 33:911–26. 10.3233/RNN-150574 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources