Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):101-108.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0009.

Neonatal Screening for Congenital Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders—Results From Germany for the Years 2006–2018

Affiliations

Neonatal Screening for Congenital Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders—Results From Germany for the Years 2006–2018

Anja Lüders et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. .

Abstract

Background: The purpose of neonatal screening is the early detection of congenital metabolic and endocrine disorders that, if untreated, could lead to fatal crises or other long-term adverse sequelae. In Germany, neonatal screening is legally regulated. Quality-assurance reports ("DGNS reports") are created and published annually by the German Society for Neonatal Screening (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neugeborenen-Screening). Data from the DGNS reports for the years 2006-2018 serve as the basis of the present publication.

Methods: For the years 2006-2018, prevalences were calculated and data on process quality were evaluated.

Results: Among 9 218 538 births, 6917 neonates were identified who had one of the target diseases. The overall prevalence was 75 per 100 000 neonates; the disorders most commonly found were congenital hypothyroidism (30 per 100 000) followed by phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCAD) (10 per 100 000 each). Of the 272 205 follow-up screenings requested, 80% were received. The rate of positive screening findings (recall rate) declined over the observation period, from 0.90% in 2006 to 0.37% in 2018. For every five positive screening findings, one case of a target disorder was confirmed. 79% of the children for whom treatment was indicated began to receive treatment within two weeks.

Conclusion: The low recall rate and the early initiation of treatment in 79% of the affected children indicate that neonatal screening for metabolic and endocrine disorders in Germany is effective. The incorporation of tracking structures and the introduction of a registry could further improve the quality of the program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of neonatal screening in Germany, 2006–2018: The screening process with the cumulative data from the years 2006–2018, showing the numbers of repeat examinations required, confirmed cases, and losses to follow-up * Actual data for 2006–2017; for 2018, estimated on basis of previous years GW, Gestational week
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recall rates for selected target disorders in neonatal screening in Germany from 2006 to 2018 Screening for congenital hypothyroidism, PKU/HPA (phenylketonuria/mild hyperphenylalaninemia) and MCAD deficiency (MCAD, medium-chain aAcyl-CoA dehydrogenase) shows a low recall rate (rate of positive screening results) even without second-tier procedures. In screening for CAH, the introduction of second-tier methods (additional analyses of the same blood sample in a second stage of examination) led to a distinct reduction in recall rate.
eFigure 1
eFigure 1
Age at time of blood sampling 2006–2018
eFigure 2
eFigure 2
Time from blood sampling to arrival of sample at laboratory
eFigure 3
eFigure 3
Time between arrival of sample at laboratory and reporting of result
eFigure 4
eFigure 4
Age at initiation of treatment

Comment in

  • Newborn Screening: Still Room for Improvement.
    Zimmer KP. Zimmer KP. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 19;118(7):99-100. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0008. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021. PMID: 33835004 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Support Deficit in Adulthood.
    Abholz HH. Abholz HH. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jul 12;118(27-28):485. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0201. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021. PMID: 34491162 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Use Existing Registry.
    Holl RW, Wölfle J. Holl RW, et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jul 12;118(27-28):485. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0202. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021. PMID: 34491163 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern (Kinder-Richtlinie), 2020; §§ 13-28. www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-2156/Kinder-RL_2020-05-14_iK-2020-03-25.pdf (last accessed on 15 July 2020)
    1. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses über die Früherkennung von Krankheiten bei Kindern (Kinder-Richtlinie), 2020; §§ 29-42. www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-2156/Kinder-RL_2020-05-14_iK-2020-03-25.pdf (last accessed on 15 July 2020)
    1. Nennstiel-Ratzel U, Lüders A, Blankenstein O. Neugeborenenscreening: ein Paradebeispiel für effektive Sekundärprävention. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58:139–145. - PubMed
    1. Gesetz über genetische Untersuchungen am Menschen (Gendiagnostikgesetz- GenDG), Ausfertigungsdatum 31.07.2009. www.gesetze-im-internet.de/gendg/BJNR252900009.html (last accessed on 15 July 2020)
    1. Nennstiel U, Lüders A, Blankenstein O, et al. DGNS Screening Reports. www.screening-dgns.de/reports.php (last accessed on 15 July 2020)

Substances