Systematic review of machine learning models for personalised dosing of heparin
- PMID: 33835524
- DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14852
Systematic review of machine learning models for personalised dosing of heparin
Abstract
Aim: To identify and critically appraise studies of prediction models, developed using machine learning (ML) methods, for determining the optimal dosing of unfractionated heparin (UFH).
Methods: Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and IEEE Xplore databases were searched from inception to 31 January 2020 to identify relevant studies using key search terms synonymous with artificial intelligence or ML, 'prediction', 'dose', 'activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)' and 'UFH.' Studies had to have used ML methods for developing models that predicted optimal dose of UFH or target therapeutic aPTT levels in the hospital setting. The CHARMS Checklist was used to assess quality and risk of bias of included studies.
Results: Of 8393 retrieved abstracts, 61 underwent full text review and eight studies met inclusion criteria. Four studies described models for predicting aPTT, three studies described models predicting optimal dose of heparin during dialysis and one study described a model that used surrogate outcomes of clotting and bleeding to predict a therapeutic aPTT. Studies varied widely in reporting of study participants, feature characterisation and selection, handling of missing data, sample size calculations and the intended clinical application of the model. Only one study conducted an external validation and no studies evaluated model impacts in clinical practice.
Conclusion: Studies of ML models for UFH dosing are few and none report a model ready for routine clinical use. Existing studies are limited by low methodological quality, inadequate reporting of study factors and absence of external validation and impact analysis.
Keywords: UFH; dose prediction; machine learning algorithm; predictive model; unfractionated heparin.
© 2021 British Pharmacological Society.
Similar articles
-
Home versus in-patient treatment for deep vein thrombosis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;1(1):CD003076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003076.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29315455 Free PMC article.
-
Antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents for primary prevention of thrombosis in individuals with antiphospholipid antibodies.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD012534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012534.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30004572 Free PMC article.
-
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29372930 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical outcomes using activated partial thromboplastin time versus antifactor-Xa for monitoring therapeutic unfractionated heparin: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Res. 2021 Dec;208:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.10.010. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Thromb Res. 2021. PMID: 34678527
-
Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Oct;23(10):1655-1668.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.020. Epub 2022 Jul 31. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35922015
Cited by
-
A Recurrent Neural Network Model for Predicting Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time After Treatment With Heparin: Retrospective Study.JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Oct 13;10(10):e39187. doi: 10.2196/39187. JMIR Med Inform. 2022. PMID: 36227653 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating automated machine learning platforms for use in healthcare.JAMIA Open. 2024 Jun 10;7(2):ooae031. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae031. eCollection 2024 Jul. JAMIA Open. 2024. PMID: 38863963 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence in clinical thrombosis and hemostasis: A review.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul 24;9(5):102984. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102984. eCollection 2025 Jul. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025. PMID: 40837028 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predicting Therapeutic Response to Unfractionated Heparin Therapy: Machine Learning Approach.Interact J Med Res. 2022 Sep 19;11(2):e34533. doi: 10.2196/34533. Interact J Med Res. 2022. PMID: 35993617 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of aPTT predictors after unfractionated heparin administration in intensive care units using machine learning models.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 21;20(7):e0328709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328709. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40690448 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Whiteley WN, Adams HP Jr, Bath PM, et al. Targeted use of heparin, heparinoids, or low-molecular-weight heparin to improve outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(6):539-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70079-6
-
- Hirsh J, Anand SS, Halperin JL, Fuster V. Guide to Anticoagulant Therapy: Heparin - A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;103(24):2994-3018.
-
- Hylek EM, Regan S, Henault LE, et al. Challenges to the Effective Use of Unfractionated Heparin in the Hospitalized Management of Acute Thrombosis. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(5):621-627.
-
- Smythe MA, Priziola J, Dobesh PP, Wirth D, Cuker A, Wittkowsky AK. Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41(1):165-186.
-
- Hyers TM. Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Past, Present, and Future. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(7):759-768.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous