Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
- PMID: 33836265
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.205
Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial
Abstract
Background: Treatment of poor prognosis metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) includes taxane chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI). We sought to determine optimal treatment in this setting.
Patients and methods: This multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase II trial recruited patients with ARPI-naive mCRPC and poor prognosis features (presence of liver metastases, progression to mCRPC after <12 months of androgen deprivation therapy, or ≥4 of 6 clinical criteria). Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive cabazitaxel plus prednisone (group A) or physician's choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone plus prednisone (group B) at standard doses. Patients could cross over at progression. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate for first-line treatment (defined as prostate-specific antigen response ≥50%, radiographic response, or stable disease ≥12 weeks).
Results: Ninety-five patients were accrued (median follow-up 21.9 months). First-line clinical benefit rate was greater in group A versus group B (80% versus 62%, P = 0.039). Overall survival was not different between groups A and B (median 37.0 versus 15.5 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, P = 0.073) nor was time to progression (median 5.3 versus 2.8 months, HR = 0.87, P = 0.52). The most common first-line treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (cabazitaxel 32% versus ARPI 0%), diarrhoea (9% versus 0%), infection (9% versus 0%), and fatigue (7% versus 5%). Baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) fraction above the cohort median and on-treatment ctDNA increase were associated with shorter time to progression (HR = 2.38, P < 0.001; HR = 4.03, P < 0.001). Patients with >30% ctDNA fraction at baseline had markedly shorter overall survival than those with undetectable ctDNA (HR = 38.22, P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Cabazitaxel was associated with a higher clinical benefit rate in patients with ARPI-naive poor prognosis mCRPC. ctDNA abundance was prognostic independent of clinical features, and holds promise as a stratification biomarker.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02254785.
Keywords: androgen receptor pathway inhibitor; circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA); plasma cell-free DNA; prostate cancer; taxane chemotherapy.
Copyright © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures KNC reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Point Biopharma, Roche, Sanofi, and grants and research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. AWW reports a commercial research grant from Janssen and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Astellas, Janssen, and Merck. AAA reports honoraria, consulting fees, and/or research funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi, Tolmar, Telix, Merck Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Ipsen, Bayer, Pfizer, Amgen, Noxopharm, Aptevo Therapeutics, Glaxo Smith Kline, MedImmune, SYNthorx, Bionomics, Merck Sharpe Dome, and Sanofi Aventis. LAW reports serving on advisory boards (with no personal financial contribution) for Pfizer, EISAI, AstraZeneca, Merck, BMS, and Ipsen, and grants from Pfizer, Merck, AstraZeneca, Roche, and BMS. BT reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Pfizer, MDS, Ipsen and Bayer, grants from Astellas, and personal fees from Sanofi, Tolmar, Novartis, IQVIA, and Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Outcomes of treatment choices in poor prognosis prostate cancer: not against all odds.Ann Oncol. 2021 Jul;32(7):831-832. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Ann Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33930524 No abstract available.
-
Use of clinical selection for intensification of therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1192-1193. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Ann Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34139270 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study.Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-1525. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30449-6. Epub 2020 Sep 11. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32926841 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Cabazitaxel Versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Older Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer in the CARD Study.Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Jul 15. Eur Urol. 2021. PMID: 34274136 Clinical Trial.
-
177Lu-PSMA-617 versus a change of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy for taxane-naive patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet. 2024 Sep 28;404(10459):1227-1239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01653-2. Epub 2024 Sep 15. Lancet. 2024. PMID: 39293462 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-World Cabazitaxel Use and Outcomes in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The Impact of Response to First ARPI.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Oct;20(5):496.e1-496.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.009. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35599196 Review.
-
Treating Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Available Therapies.J Urol. 2015 Dec;194(6):1537-47. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.106. Epub 2015 Jul 18. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26196735 Review.
Cited by
-
RNA Biomarkers as a Response Measure for Survival in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 14;13(24):6279. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246279. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34944897 Free PMC article.
-
Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Oct 17:10.1038/s41391-024-00906-z. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00906-z. Online ahead of print. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024. PMID: 39420184 Review.
-
Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study.Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Dec 15;27(24):6677-6686. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2199. Epub 2021 Oct 1. Clin Cancer Res. 2021. PMID: 34598946 Free PMC article.
-
Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and taxanes in metastatic prostate cancer: an outcome-adaptive randomized platform trial.Nat Med. 2024 Nov;30(11):3291-3302. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03204-2. Epub 2024 Aug 20. Nat Med. 2024. PMID: 39164518 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessment of the therapeutic efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-X compared to taxane chemotherapy in taxane-chemo-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Feb;52(3):936-954. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06932-2. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025. PMID: 39453485
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical