Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 9;10(1):103.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01652-2.

The informed consent process in health research with under-served populations: a realist review protocol

Affiliations

The informed consent process in health research with under-served populations: a realist review protocol

Eleanor Hoverd et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The informed consent process aims to provide potential participants with information about health research that enables them to make an informed decision as to whether they choose to participate, or not. However, it remains unclear as to whether the process is effective for those who are under-served in health research. It is a pivotal issue within health research that the diversity of people who participate is broadened. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) pledges to support equality, diversity and inclusion, actively creating opportunities for all citizens whom are eligible, to take part in health research.

Methods: In order to understand how the informed consent process for under-served populations in health research works, under what circumstances and in what respects, a realist review approach will be undertaken. Searches will be carried out using electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science and PsycINFO), along with selected websites and grey literature. Development of initial rough programme theory(ies) will lead to a more refined programme theory that will provide an explanation of context, mechanism and outcomes. Stakeholder involvement by NIHR (Public) Research Champions, health professionals and clinical academics will provide expert opinion about concepts and programme theory.

Discussion: Findings of this realist review will highlight how the informed consent process in health research affects the experience and decision-making process of potential participants from under-served populations. They will be written up in accordance with RAMESES guidelines and disseminated to patients and the public, health researchers, health professionals and policymakers through peer-reviewed publication, presentations and discussions. The review will contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms that cause both positive and negative outcomes in the informed consent process for those whom are often under-represented in health research to inform policy, study design and delivery.

Keywords: Health research; Informed consent; Realist review; Under-served.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have competing interest.

References

    1. Corbett J, D'Angelo C, Gangitano L, et al. Future of Health: findings from a survey of stakeholders on the future of health and healthcare in England. Dep Health. 2017;1–72. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2147.html. Accessed 11 Feb 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis T, Holcombe R, Berkel H, et al. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(9):668–674. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dunn L, Jeste D. Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001;24(6):595–607. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00218-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kadam R. Informed consent process: a step further towards making it meaningful! Perspect Clin Res. 2017;8(3):107–112. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_147_16. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughson J, Woodward-Kron R, Parker A, et al. A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials. Trials. 2016. 10.1186/s13063-016-1384-3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources