Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e041861.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041861.

Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM)

Affiliations

Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM)

Zephanie Tyack et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with children have been described as 'giving a voice to the child'. Few studies have examined the routine use of these measures as potentially therapeutic interventions. This study aims to investigate: (1) the effectiveness of feedback using graphical displays of information from electronic PROMs (ePROMs) that target health-related quality of life, to improve health outcomes, referrals and treatment satisfaction and (2) the implementation of ePROMs and graphical displays by assessing acceptability, sustainability, cost, fidelity and context of the intervention and study processes.

Methods and analysis: A hybrid II effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted from February 2020 with children with life-altering skin conditions attending two outpatient clinics at a specialist paediatric children's hospital. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation will be completed. Randomisation will occur at the child participant level. Children or parent proxies completing baseline ePROMs will be randomised to: (1) completion of ePROMs plus graphical displays of ePROM results to treating clinicians in consultations, versus (2) completion of ePROMs without graphical display of ePROM results. The primary outcome of the effectiveness trial will be overall health-related quality of life of children. Secondary outcomes will include other health-related quality of life outcomes (eg, child psychosocial and physical health, parent psychosocial health), referrals and treatment satisfaction. Trial data will be primarily analysed using linear mixed-effects models; and implementation data using inductive thematic analysis of interviews, meeting minutes, observational field notes and study communication mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from Children's Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QCHQ/56290), The University of Queensland (2019002233) and Queensland University of Technology (1900000847). Dissemination will occur through stakeholder groups, scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000174987).

Keywords: change management; organisation of health services; paediatric dermatology; paediatrics; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ZT, MS and RMK developed the Brisbane Burn Scar Impact Profile which was included as a scar-specific measure in this study. MS and RMK were clinical staff members of the health service where the study will be conducted at the time of submission.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials flow diagram for the effectiveness study component.*Baseline measures completed prior to randomization; ≥2nd appointment vascular clinic, ≥1st appointment scar clinic. PROMs, electronic, **burn scar clinic only; ***vascular clinic only PROMs. CHU-9D, Child Health Utility – 9 item; Peds-QL, Pediatric Evaluation of Quality of Life Inventory; PROM, patient-reported outcome measure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. De Rosis S, Cerasuolo D, Nuti S. Using patient-reported measures to drive change in healthcare: the experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:315. 10.1186/s12913-020-05099-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Basch E. Patient-Reported Outcomes - Harnessing Patients' Voices to Improve Clinical Care. N Engl J Med 2017;376:105–8. 10.1056/NEJMp1611252 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Field J, Holmes MM, Newell D. PROMs data: can it be used to make decisions for individual patients? A narrative review. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2019;10:233–41. 10.2147/PROM.S156291 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ishaque S, Karnon J, Chen G, et al. . A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res 2019;28:567–92. 10.1007/s11136-018-2016-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Wit M, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Bokma JA, et al. . Monitoring and discussing health-related quality of life in adolescents with type 1 diabetes improve psychosocial well-being: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1521–6. 10.2337/dc08-0394 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources