Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1912443118.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912443118.

Measuring the news and its impact on democracy

Affiliations
Review

Measuring the news and its impact on democracy

Duncan J Watts et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Since the 2016 US presidential election, the deliberate spread of misinformation online, and on social media in particular, has generated extraordinary concern, in large part because of its potential effects on public opinion, political polarization, and ultimately democratic decision making. Recently, however, a handful of papers have argued that both the prevalence and consumption of "fake news" per se is extremely low compared with other types of news and news-relevant content. Although neither prevalence nor consumption is a direct measure of influence, this work suggests that proper understanding of misinformation and its effects requires a much broader view of the problem, encompassing biased and misleading-but not necessarily factually incorrect-information that is routinely produced or amplified by mainstream news organizations. In this paper, we propose an ambitious collective research agenda to measure the origins, nature, and prevalence of misinformation, broadly construed, as well as its impact on democracy. We also sketch out some illustrative examples of completed, ongoing, or planned research projects that contribute to this agenda.

Keywords: democracy; media; misinformation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the information ecosystem.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allcott H., Gentzkow M., Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–236 (2017).
    1. Wardle C., Derakhshan H., “Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking” (DGI(2017)09, Council of Europe, 2017).
    1. Shu K., Sliva A., Wang S., Tang J., Liu H., Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. SIGKDD Explor. 19, 22–36 (2017).
    1. Tucker J., et al. ., Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. SSRN [Preprint] (2018). 10.2139/ssrn.3144139 (Accessed 12 March 2021). - DOI
    1. Lazer D. M. J., et al. ., The science of fake news. Science 359, 1094–1096 (2018). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources