An economic analysis of a wearable patient sensor for preventing hospital-acquired pressure injuries among the acutely ill patients
- PMID: 33837491
- PMCID: PMC8034272
- DOI: 10.1007/s10754-021-09304-7
An economic analysis of a wearable patient sensor for preventing hospital-acquired pressure injuries among the acutely ill patients
Abstract
More than 2.5 million people in the United States develop pressure injuries annually, which are one of the most common complications occurring in hospitals. Despite being common, hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) are largely considered preventable by regular patient turning. Although current methodologies to prompt on-time repositioning have limited efficacy, a wearable patient sensor has been shown to optimize turning practices and improve clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of patient-wearable sensor in the prevention of HAPIs in acutely ill patients when compared to standard practice alone. A decision analytic model was developed to simulate the expected costs and outcomes from the payer's perspective using data from published literature, including a recently published randomized controlled trial. Both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted. The patient-wearable sensor was found to be cost saving (dominant). It resulted in better clinical outcomes (77% reduction in HAPIs) compared to standard care and an expected cost savings of $6,621 per patient over a one-year period. Applying the model to a cohort of 1,000 patients, an estimated 203 HAPIs would be avoided with annualized cost reduction of $6,222,884 through all patient treatment settings. The probabilistic analysis returned similar results. In conclusion, the patient-wearable sensor was found to be cost-effective in the prevention of HAPIs and cost-saving to payers and hospitals. These results suggest that patient-wearable sensors should be considered as a cost-effective alternative to standard care in the prevention of HAPIs.
Keywords: Cost effectiveness; Hospital-acquired conditions; Pressure injuries; Prevention; Wearable sensors.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Nherera, Dr. Larson and Ms. Cooley are employees of Smith + Nephew. Dr. Reinhard is a paid consultant of Smith + Nephew.
Figures
References
-
- Berlowitz D, Lukas CV, Parker V, Niederhauser A, Silver J, Logan C, Ayello E, Zulkowski K. (2019). Agency for healthcare research and quality. Preventing Pressure Ulcers in the Hospitals. A Toolkit for Improving Care. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/putoolkit.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2020).
-
- Bysshe, T, Gao, Y., Heaney-Huls, K., Hockenberry, J., Hovey, L., Laffan, A.M., Lee, S., Murphy, D.J., Watts, E.A. (2017). Estimating the Additional Hospital Inpatient Cost and Mortality Associated With Selected Hospital-Acquired Conditions. AHRQ Publication No. 18–0011-EF. https://www.ahrq.gov/hai/pfp/haccost2017.html (Accessed 20 Jun 2020).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical