Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 25;27(36):9446-9453.
doi: 10.1002/chem.202101060. Epub 2021 May 19.

Molecular Sieving of Acetylene from Ethylene in a Rigid Ultra-microporous Metal Organic Framework

Affiliations

Molecular Sieving of Acetylene from Ethylene in a Rigid Ultra-microporous Metal Organic Framework

Xue Jiang et al. Chemistry. .

Abstract

Rigid molecular sieving materials are the ideal candidates for gas separation (e. g., C2 H2 /C2 H4 ) due to their ultrahigh adsorption selectivity and the absence of gas co-adsorption. However, the absolute molecular sieving effect for C2 H2 /C2 H4 separation has rarely been realized because of their similar physicochemical properties. Herein, we demonstrate the absolute molecular sieving of C2 H2 from C2 H4 by a rigid ultra-microporous metal-organic framework (F-PYMO-Cu) with 1D regular channels (pore size of ca. 3.4 Å). F-PYMO-Cu exhibited moderate acetylene uptake (35.5 cm3 /cm3 ), but very low ethylene uptake (0.55 cm3 /cm3 ) at 298 K and 1 bar, yielding the second highest C2 H2 /C2 H4 uptake ratio of 63.6 up to now. One-step C2 H4 production from a binary mixture of C2 H2 /C2 H4 and a ternary mixture of C2 H2 /CO2 /C2 H4 at 298 K was achieved and verified by dynamic breakthrough experiments. Coupled with excellent thermal and water stability, F-PYMO-Cu could be a promising candidate for industrial C2 separation tasks.

Keywords: ethylene production; gas separation; molecular sieving; ultra-microporous metal organic frameworks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. D. S. Sholl, R. P. Lively, Nature 2016, 532, 435-437.
    1. None
    1. C. Godínez, A. L. Cabanes, G. Víllora, Chem. Eng. Process. 1995, 34, 459-468;
    1. T. Ren, M. K. Patel, K. Blok, Energy 2008, 33, 817-833.
    1. H. Molero, B. F. Bartlett, W. T. Tysoe, J. Catal. 1999, 181, 49-56.

LinkOut - more resources