Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;18(9):1482-1490.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.044. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

Validation of an algorithm for continuous monitoring of atrial fibrillation using a consumer smartwatch

Affiliations
Free article

Validation of an algorithm for continuous monitoring of atrial fibrillation using a consumer smartwatch

Robert Avram et al. Heart Rhythm. 2021 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Consumer devices with broad reach may be useful in screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in appropriate populations. However, currently no consumer devices are capable of continuous monitoring for AF.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a smartwatch algorithm for continuous detection of AF from sinus rhythm in a free-living setting.

Methods: We studied a commercially available smartwatch with photoplethysmography (W-PPG) and electrocardiogram (W-ECG) capabilities. We validated a novel W-PPG algorithm combined with a W-ECG algorithm in a free-living setting, and compared the results to those of a 28-day continuous ECG patch (P-ECG).

Results: A total of 204 participants completed the free-living study, recording 81,944 hours with both P-ECG and smartwatch measurements. We found sensitivity of 87.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.6%-91.0%) and specificity of 97.4% (95% CI 97.1%-97.7%) for the W-PPG algorithm (every 5-minute classification); sensitivity of 98.9% (95% CI 98.1%-99.4%) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI 99.1%-99.5%) for the W-ECG algorithm; and sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI 93.7%-98.5%) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI 98.4%-99.7%) for W-PPG triggered W-ECG with a single W-ECG required for confirmation of AF. We found a very strong correlation of W-PPG in quantifying AF burden compared to P-ECG (r = 0.98).

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that a novel algorithm using a commercially available smartwatch can continuously detect AF with excellent performance and that confirmation with W-ECG further enhances specificity. In addition, our W-PPG algorithm can estimate AF burden. Further research is needed to determine whether this algorithm is useful in screening for AF in select at-risk patients.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Atrial fibrillation burden; Photoplethysmography Remote monitoring; Screening; Smartwatch.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types