Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 May:277:113900.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113900. Epub 2021 Apr 3.

Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine

Affiliations
Review

Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine

Elizabeth C Thomas et al. Soc Sci Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

The contemporary healthcare field operates according to an autonomy model of medical decision-making. This model stipulates that patients have the right to make informed choices about their care. Shared decision making (SDM) has arisen as the dominant approach for clinicians and patients to collaborate in care planning and implementation. This approach relies heavily on normative (rational) decision-making processes, and often leaves out descriptive influences that stem from personal, social, and environmental factors and explain how decisions are typically made in the real world. The lack of attention to descriptive decision-making limits SDM in many ways. A multi-level approach to expanding the practice of SDM is proposed, including tailoring the decision encounter based on patients' social, cultural, and environmental context; using relational elements strategically as part of the SDM process; and modifying incentive models to promote greater attention to descriptive impacts on decision-making. These modifications are expected to make SDM, and thus patient care, more inclusive, effective, and acceptable to diverse patients.

Keywords: Descriptive decision-making; Medical decision making; Normative decision-making; Patient-centered care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Expanding the Practice of SDM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2016). The SHARE Approach: A Model for Shared Decisionmaking - Fact Sheet. Rockville, MD. Report No.: 14-0034-1-EF.
    1. Albert SM, & Duffy J (2012). Differences in risk aversion between young and older adults. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics. doi: 10.2147/NAN.S27184. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Applebaum PS, Lidz CW, & Meisel A (1987). Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    1. Arrieta A, García-Prado A, González P, & Pinto-Prades JL (2017). Risk attitudes in medical decisions for others: An experimental approach. Health Economics, 26, 97–113. - PubMed
    1. Banerjee A, & Sanyal D (2012). Dynamics of doctor-patient relationship: A cross-sectional study on concordance, trust, and patient enablement. Journal of Family & Community Medicine, 19, 12–19. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types