Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 10;21(1):204.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02650-7.

Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education

Affiliations

Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education

B Kumaravel et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Medical students often struggle to understand the relevance of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) to their clinical practice, yet it is a competence that all students must develop prior to graduation. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are a valued assessment tool to assess critical components of EBM competency, particularly different levels of mastery as they progress through the course. This study developed and evaluated EBM based OSCE stations with an aim to establish a spiral approach for EBM OSCE stations for undergraduate medical students.

Methods: OSCE stations were developed with increasingly complex EBM tasks. OSCE stations were classified according to the classification rubric for EBP assessment tools (CREATE) framework and mapped against the recently published core competencies for evidence-based practice (EBP). Performance data evaluation was undertaken using Classical Test Theory analysing mean scores, pass rates, and station item total correlation (ITC) using SPSS.

Results: Six EBM based OSCE stations assessing various stages of EBM were created for use in high stakes summative OSCEs for different year groups across the undergraduate medical degree. All OSCE stations, except for one, had excellent correlation coefficients and hence a high reliability, ranging from 0.21-0.49. The domain mean score ranged from 13.33 to 16.83 out of 20. High reliability was demonstrated for the each of the summative OSCE circuits (Cronbach's alpha = 0.67-0.85). In the CREATE framework these stations assessed knowledge, skills, and behaviour of medical students in asking, searching, appraising, and integrating evidence in practice. The OSCE stations were useful in assessing six core evidence-based practice competencies, which are meant to be practiced with exercises. A spiral model of OSCEs of increasing complexity was proposed to assess EBM competency as students progressed through the MBChB course.

Conclusions: The use of the OSCEs is a feasible method of authentically assessing leaner EBM performance and behaviour in a high stakes assessment setting. Use of valid and reliable EBM-based OSCE stations provide evidence for continued development of a hierarchy of assessing scaffolded learning and mastery of EBM competency. Further work is needed to assess their predictive validity.

Keywords: Competency; Evidence-based medicine; OSCEs; Summative; Undergraduate medical curriculum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
EBM integrated as a longitudinal theme in UBMS
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Spiral EBM curriculum in MBChB course in UBMS

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71–72. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Straus SE, Glasziou P, Richardson WS, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 2019.
    1. Meats E, Heneghan C, Crilly M, Glasziou P. Evidence-based medicine teaching in UK medical schools. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):332–337. doi: 10.1080/01421590802572791. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Albarqouni L, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured. BMC Med Educ 2018;18(1). [cited 2018 Nov 27]. Available from: 10.1186/s12909-018-1284-1 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young T, Rohwer A, Volmink J, Clarke M. What are the effects of teaching evidence-based health care (ebhc)? Overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e86706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086706. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources