Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 5;5(2):zrab006.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab006.

A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery

Affiliations

A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery

D Harji et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: The incidence of incisional hernia is up to 20 per cent after abdominal surgery. The management of patients with incisional hernia can be complex with an array of techniques and meshes available. Ensuring consistency in reporting outcomes across studies on incisional hernia is important and will enable appropriate interpretation, comparison and data synthesis across a range of clinical and operative treatment strategies.

Methods: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies documenting clinical and patient-reported outcomes for incisional hernia were included.

Results: In total, 1340 studies were screened, of which 92 were included, reporting outcomes on 12 292 patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Eight broad-based outcome domains were identified, including patient and clinical demographics, hernia-related symptoms, hernia morphology, recurrent incisional hernia, operative variables, postoperative variables, follow-up and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence rates were reported in 80 studies (87 per cent). A total of nine different definitions for detecting hernia recurrence were identified. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 31 studies (34 per cent), with 18 different assessment measures used.

Conclusions: This review demonstrates the significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting in incisional hernia studies, with significant variation in outcome assessment and definitions. This is coupled with significant under-reporting of patient-reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram showing search strategy
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Outcomes extracted
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Study bias according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study bias according to the ROBINS-I risk of bias domain for observational studies

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 2012;204:144–150 - PubMed
    1. Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Alawadi ZM, Nguyen MT, Ko TC et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and reviews in the management of ventral hernias. J Surg Res 2016;204:311–318 - PubMed
    1. Bhangu A, Singh P, Pinkney T, Blazeby JM. A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2015;19:65–75 - PubMed
    1. Parker SG, Wood CPJ, Butterworth JW, Boulton RW, Plumb AAO, Mallett S et al. A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed. Hernia 2018;22:215–226 - PubMed
    1. Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28–30 June 2012. Hernia 2013;17:423–433 - PubMed

Publication types