A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery
- PMID: 33839746
- PMCID: PMC8038267
- DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab006
A systematic review of outcome reporting in incisional hernia surgery
Abstract
Background: The incidence of incisional hernia is up to 20 per cent after abdominal surgery. The management of patients with incisional hernia can be complex with an array of techniques and meshes available. Ensuring consistency in reporting outcomes across studies on incisional hernia is important and will enable appropriate interpretation, comparison and data synthesis across a range of clinical and operative treatment strategies.
Methods: Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All studies documenting clinical and patient-reported outcomes for incisional hernia were included.
Results: In total, 1340 studies were screened, of which 92 were included, reporting outcomes on 12 292 patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Eight broad-based outcome domains were identified, including patient and clinical demographics, hernia-related symptoms, hernia morphology, recurrent incisional hernia, operative variables, postoperative variables, follow-up and patient-reported outcomes. Clinical outcomes such as hernia recurrence rates were reported in 80 studies (87 per cent). A total of nine different definitions for detecting hernia recurrence were identified. Patient-reported outcomes were reported in 31 studies (34 per cent), with 18 different assessment measures used.
Conclusions: This review demonstrates the significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting in incisional hernia studies, with significant variation in outcome assessment and definitions. This is coupled with significant under-reporting of patient-reported outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03278-y. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 39966185 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Mar;403(2):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1639-9. Epub 2017 Dec 6. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018. PMID: 29214543
-
Analysis of 4,015 recurrent incisional hernia repairs from the Herniamed registry: risk factors and outcomes.Hernia. 2021 Feb;25(1):61-75. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02263-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Hernia. 2021. PMID: 32671683
-
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27750295
-
Complete mesh migration into the small bowel after incisional hernia repair: a case report and literature review.Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Apr;117(2):118-121. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2016.1229399. Epub 2016 Sep 9. Acta Chir Belg. 2017. PMID: 27609029 Review.
Cited by
-
Interim analysis of single - centre randomised controlled trial on incisional hernia repair with vs without synthetic mesh fixation.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Apr 21;410(1):134. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03707-7. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025. PMID: 40257601 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Incisional Hernias after Vascular Surgery for Aortoiliac Aneurysm and Aortoiliac Occlusive Arterial Disease: Has Prophylactic Mesh Changed This Scenario?Aorta (Stamford). 2023 Jun;11(3):107-111. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771475. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Aorta (Stamford). 2023. PMID: 37619567 Free PMC article.
-
No difference in outcomes between large- and small-pore meshes in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial investigating open retromuscular meshplasty for incisional hernia repair.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 13;408(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02751-x. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 36635466 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Standardized suturing can prevent slackening or bursting suture lines in midline abdominal incisions and defects.Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1611-1623. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02659-x. Epub 2022 Aug 23. Hernia. 2022. PMID: 35997898 Free PMC article.
-
Mapping the therapeutic landscape in emergency incisional hernia: a scoping review.Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):102. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03278-y. Hernia. 2025. PMID: 39966185 Free PMC article.
References
-
- van Ramshorst GH, Eker HH, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Impact of incisional hernia on health-related quality of life and body image: a prospective cohort study. Am J Surg 2012;204:144–150 - PubMed
-
- Holihan JL, Nguyen DH, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Alawadi ZM, Nguyen MT, Ko TC et al. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and reviews in the management of ventral hernias. J Surg Res 2016;204:311–318 - PubMed
-
- Bhangu A, Singh P, Pinkney T, Blazeby JM. A detailed analysis of outcome reporting from randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses of inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 2015;19:65–75 - PubMed
-
- Parker SG, Wood CPJ, Butterworth JW, Boulton RW, Plumb AAO, Mallett S et al. A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed. Hernia 2018;22:215–226 - PubMed
-
- Muysoms FE, Deerenberg EB, Peeters E, Agresta F, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G et al. Recommendations for reporting outcome results in abdominal wall repair: results of a Consensus meeting in Palermo, Italy, 28–30 June 2012. Hernia 2013;17:423–433 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources