Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:131:325-327.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_62.

Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Assessment in Patients with Suspected Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Bernhard Schmidt  1 , Marek Czosnyka  2 , Danilo Cardim  3 , Bernhard Rosengarten  4
Affiliations

Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Assessment in Patients with Suspected Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Bernhard Schmidt et al. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021.

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) usually occurs in obese women of childbearing age. Typical symptoms are headache and sight disorders. Besides ophthalmoscopy, lumbar puncture is used for both diagnosis and therapy of IIH. In this study, noninvasively-assessed intracranial pressure (nICP) was compared to lumbar pressure (LP) to clarify its suitability for diagnosis of IIH.

Methods: nICP was calculated using continuous signals of arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity, a method previously introduced by the authors. In thirteen patients (f = 11, m = 2; age: 36 ± 10 years), nICP was assessed 1 h prior to LP. If LP was >20 cmH2O (~15 mmHg), lumbar drainage was performed, LP was measured again, and nICP was reassessed.

Results: In six patients, LP and nICP were compared after lumbar drainage. In three patients, assessment of nICP versus LP was repeated. In total, LP and nICP correlated with R = 0.82 (p < 0.001; N = 22). Mean difference of ICP-nICP was 0.8 ± 3.7 mmHg. Presuming 15 mmHg as critical threshold for indication of lumbar drainage in 20 of 22 cases, the clinical implications would have been the same in both methods.

Conclusion: TCD-based ICP assessment seems to be a promising method for pre-diagnosis of increased LP and might prevent the need for lumbar puncture if nICP is low.

Keywords: Arterial blood pressure; Cerebral blood flow velocity; Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Lumbar pressure; Lumbar puncture; Noninvasive ICP; Pseudotumour cerebri; Transcranial Doppler.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wakerley BR, Tan MH, Ting EY (2015) Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Cephalalgia 35(3):248–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414534329 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt B, Klingelhöfer J, Schwarze JJ, Sander D, Wittich I (1997) Noninvasive prediction of intracranial pressure curves using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and blood pressure curves. Stroke 28:2465–2472 - DOI
    1. Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Klingelhöfer J (2002) Clinical applications of a non-invasive ICP monitoring method. Eur J Ultrasound 16(1–2):37–45 - DOI
    1. Schmidt B, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Plontke R, Schwarze JJ, Klingelhöfer J, Pickard JD (2016) Noninvasive assessment of ICP: evaluation of new TBI data. In: Ang BT (ed) Intracranial pressure and brain monitoring XV, Acta Neurochir Suppl, vol 122. Springer, Cham, pp 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_14 - DOI
    1. Cardim D, Robba C, Donnelly J, Bohdanowicz M, Schmidt B, Damian M, Varsos GV, Liu X, Cabeleira M, Frigieri G, Cabella B, Smielewski P, Mascarenhas S, Czosnyka M (2016) Prospective study on noninvasive assessment of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain-injured patients: comparison of four methods. J Neurotrauma 33:792–802. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.4134 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

LinkOut - more resources