Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun;142(6):1185-1188.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03888-y. Epub 2021 Apr 11.

The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray

Affiliations

The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray

Bernd Lutz et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) allows a more reliable determination. The objective was to assess the reliability of the ER in CT and to determine the correlation between the ER in CT and a.p. X-ray of the knee.

Methods: The ER was determined on X-ray and CT images of a consecutive series of 107 patients, who underwent rTKA. Measurements were made by two blinded observes, one measured twice. The inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as the correlation between the two methods, were quantified with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

Results: The average lateral ER was 0.32 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.32 (± 0.04) in CT. On the medial side, the average ER was 0.34 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.35 (± 0.04) in CT. The interobserver agreement for the same imaging modality was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.81 in X-ray as well as lateral 0.74 and medial 0.85 in CT. The correlation between the two methods was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.79.

Conclusions: The ER can be reliably determined in X-ray and CT. Measurements of the two image modalities correlate. Prior to rTKA, the sole use of the X-ray is possible.

Keywords: Epicondylar ratio; Joint line; Knee replacement; Revision total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The epicondylar ratio. Measurement of the LER and MER in X-ray on the left and CT on the right. TED transepicondylar distance, JL joint line, LE JL distance between the lateral epicondyle and the joint line, ME JL distance between the medial epicondyle and the joint line

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bieger R, Huch K, Kocak S, Jung S, Reichel H, Kappe T. The influence of joint line restoration on the results of revision total knee arthroplasty: comparison between distance and ratio-methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:537–541. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1953-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on the function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68:1035–1040. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198668070-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hofmann AA, Kurtin SM, Lyons S, Tanner AM, Bolognesi MP. Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:1154–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iacono F, Presti Lo M, Bruni D, Raspugli GF, Bignozzi S, Sharma B, Marcacci M. The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line. Knee Surg Sports TraumatolArthrosc. 2013;21:2725–2729. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2113-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim AD, Scott RD. Can the visibility of both prosthetic posterior femoral condyles on a postoperative radiograph assure that limb rotation is appropriate to allow accurate measurement of the anatomic knee axis? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2593–2596. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.026. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources