The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
- PMID: 33839911
- PMCID: PMC9110527
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03888-y
The epicondylar ratio can be reliably determined in both computed tomography and X-ray
Abstract
Purpose: One of the key factors to the successful revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is the reconstruction of the joint line, which can be determined using the epicondylar ratio (ER). The measurement is established in X-ray and MRI. However, it is not known whether computed tomography (CT) allows a more reliable determination. The objective was to assess the reliability of the ER in CT and to determine the correlation between the ER in CT and a.p. X-ray of the knee.
Methods: The ER was determined on X-ray and CT images of a consecutive series of 107 patients, who underwent rTKA. Measurements were made by two blinded observes, one measured twice. The inter- and intraobserver agreement, as well as the correlation between the two methods, were quantified with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Results: The average lateral ER was 0.32 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.32 (± 0.04) in CT. On the medial side, the average ER was 0.34 (± 0.04) in X-ray and 0.35 (± 0.04) in CT. The interobserver agreement for the same imaging modality was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.81 in X-ray as well as lateral 0.74 and medial 0.85 in CT. The correlation between the two methods was lateral 0.81 and medial 0.79.
Conclusions: The ER can be reliably determined in X-ray and CT. Measurements of the two image modalities correlate. Prior to rTKA, the sole use of the X-ray is possible.
Keywords: Epicondylar ratio; Joint line; Knee replacement; Revision total knee arthroplasty.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The epicondylar ratio can be reliably used on X-ray of the knee to determine the joint line.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Sep;138(9):1287-1292. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3003-0. Epub 2018 Jul 24. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018. PMID: 30043148
-
Intra- and interobserver reliability and agreement in three-dimensional computed tomography measurements of component positions after total knee arthroplasty.Knee. 2019 Oct;26(5):1102-1110. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 21. Knee. 2019. PMID: 31340892
-
The type of approach does not influence TKA component position in revision total knee arthroplasty - A clinical study using 3D-CT.Knee. 2018 Jun;25(3):473-479. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Mar 26. Knee. 2018. PMID: 29599025
-
Intra- and postoperative assessment of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty: an EKA knee expert group clinical review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):772-782. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06006-4. Epub 2020 Apr 30. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021. PMID: 32350578
-
Wear patterns in anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee evaluated with CT-arthrography.Knee. 2014;21 Suppl 1:S15-9. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50004-X. Knee. 2014. PMID: 25382362 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty: therapeutic options and results.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Nov 19;6(11):1073-1086. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210007. eCollection 2021 Nov. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34909226 Free PMC article. Review.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical