Past and Current Practice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 33840437
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.11.004
Past and Current Practice of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement in Randomized Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objectives: In our systematic review, we assessed past and current practice of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement in cancer randomized, controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We included RCTs with PRO endpoints evaluating conventional medical treatments, conducted in patients with the most prevalent solid tumor types (breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, bladder, and gynecological cancers) and either published in 2004 to 2018 or registered on clinicaltrials.gov and initiated in 2014 to 2019. Frequency of use of individual PRO measures was assessed overall, over time, and by cancer site.
Results: Screening of 42 095 database records and 3425 registered trials identified 480 published and 537 registered trials meeting inclusion criteria. Among published trials, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) measures were used most often (54.8% of trials), followed by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measures (35.8%), the EQ-5D (10.2%), the SF-36 (7.3%), and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI; 2.5%). Among registered trials, the EORTC measures were used in 66.1% of the trials, followed by the FACIT measures (25.9%), the EQ-5D (23.1%), the SF-36 (4.8%), the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE; 2.2%), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures (1.7%), and the MDASI measures (1.1%).
Conclusion: The PRO measures most frequently used in RCTs identified in our review differ substantially in terms of content and domains, reflecting the ongoing debate among the scientific community, healthcare providers, and regulators on the type of PRO to be measured. Current findings may contribute to better informing the development of an internationally agreed core outcome set for future cancer trials.
Keywords: cancer; patient-reported outcome; questionnaire; randomized-controlled trial; systematic review.
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating the use of the EORTC patient-reported outcome measures for improving inter-rater reliability of CTCAE ratings in a mixed population of cancer patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04745-w. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33050917 Free PMC article.
-
Inclusion of older patients with cancer in randomised controlled trials with patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review.BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):451-463. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001902. Epub 2019 Nov 12. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019. PMID: 31719051
-
Harnessing the patient voice in prostate cancer research: Systematic review on the use of patient-reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials to support clinical decision-making.Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(12):4039-4058. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3018. Epub 2020 Apr 25. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32333639 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement properties of selected patient-reported outcome measures for use in randomised controlled trials in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review.Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Jun;7(1):e000373. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000373. Lupus Sci Med. 2020. PMID: 32591423 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating Trends in the Quality of Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Over Time: Analysis of 631 Randomized Controlled Trials Published Between 2004 and 2019.Value Health. 2021 Dec;24(12):1715-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Value Health. 2021. PMID: 34838268
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Dec 24;14(1):84. doi: 10.3390/cancers14010084. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35008247 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Data collection methods for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer randomised controlled trials: a protocol for a rapid scoping review.BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 10;14(9):e084935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084935. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39260865 Free PMC article.
-
The patients have spoken: how does enfortumab vedotin impact quality of life?Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Apr 30;14(4):868-871. doi: 10.21037/tau-2025-45. Epub 2025 Apr 17. Transl Androl Urol. 2025. PMID: 40376537 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures for physical function in cancer patients: content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01826-z. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023. PMID: 36681808 Free PMC article.
-
The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Hong Kong valuation study.Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jul;25(5):889-901. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01632-4. Epub 2023 Sep 28. Eur J Health Econ. 2024. PMID: 37768519
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous