Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;23(3):256-263.
doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000750.

Family Members' Knowledge and Attitude Toward Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Family Members' Knowledge and Attitude Toward Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Sunjung Kim et al. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. .

Abstract

The decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) lies sometimes in the hands of intensive care unit patients' families. Since 2018, family members of dying patients in South Korea have had the legal right to make decisions for the patients. This study aimed to examine knowledge and attitude toward LST among the family members of patients under intensive care since the foundation of the new legislation. Their perceptions of the roles of nurses were also explored. In this cross-sectional study, 89 participants completed survey questionnaires on demographic characteristics, relationship to patient, reason for admission, length of stay, awareness of the new legislation, knowledge and attitude toward LST, and perception of the role of nurses. The results indicated that knowledge was significantly associated with attitude and was, in fact, the only predictor of attitude toward LST (P = .021). Explaining the disease and prognosis in detail and relieving patients of their physical pain were the roles of nurses most valued by family members. The findings suggest that it is crucial for nurses to support family members and provide information about critical changes and medical options for collaborative decision making according to the patients' wishes during the dying process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

    1. Aghabarary M, Dehghan Nayeri N. Medical futility and its challenges: a review study. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2016;9:11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koesel N, Link M. Conflicts in goals of care at the end of life: are aggressive life-prolonging interventions and a “good death” compatible? J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2014;16(6):330–335.
    1. Mark N, Rayner S, Lee N, Curtis J. Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(9):1572–1585. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jang W, Ann K, Kim M, Kim Y, Han Y. The role of a patient's family when the withdrawal of LST is expected: a narrative analysis. Korean J Med Ethics. 2015;18(2):172–189. doi: 10.35301/ksme.2015.18.2.172. - DOI
    1. Kisorio L, Langley G. End-of-life care in intensive care unit: family experiences. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;35:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2016.03.003. - DOI - PubMed