Numerical Magnitude Processing in Deaf Adolescents and Its Contribution to Arithmetical Ability
- PMID: 33841229
- PMCID: PMC8026863
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584183
Numerical Magnitude Processing in Deaf Adolescents and Its Contribution to Arithmetical Ability
Abstract
Although most deaf individuals could use sign language or sign/spoken language mix, hearing loss would still affect their language acquisition. Compensatory plasticity holds that the lack of auditory stimulation experienced by deaf individuals, such as congenital deafness, can be met by enhancements in visual cognition. And the studies of hearing individuals have showed that visual form perception is the cognitive mechanism that could explain the association between numerical magnitude processing and arithmetic computation. Therefore, we examined numerical magnitude processing and its contribution to arithmetical ability in deaf adolescents, and explored the differences between the congenital and acquired deafness. 112 deaf adolescents (58 congenital deafness) and 58 hearing adolescents performed a series of cognitive and mathematical tests, and it was found there was no significant differences between the congenital group and the hearing group, but congenital group outperformed acquired group in numerical magnitude processing (reaction time) and arithmetic computation. It was also found there was a close association between numerical magnitude processing and arithmetic computation in all deaf adolescents, and after controlling for the demographic variables (age, gender, onset of hearing loss) and general cognitive abilities (non-verbal IQ, processing speed, reading comprehension), numerical magnitude processing could predict arithmetic computation in all deaf adolescents but not in congenital group. The role of numerical magnitude processing (symbolic and non-symbolic) in deaf adolescents' mathematical performance should be paid attention in the training of arithmetical ability.
Keywords: acquired deafness; arithmetic computation; congenital deafness; mathematical cognition; numerical magnitude representation.
Copyright © 2021 Chen, Wang and Wen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Arithmetic in the adult deaf signing brain.J Neurosci Res. 2020 Apr;98(4):643-654. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24569. Epub 2019 Dec 5. J Neurosci Res. 2020. PMID: 31803973
-
The power of language: Functional brain network topology of deaf and hearing in relation to sign language experience.Hear Res. 2019 Mar 1;373:32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 15. Hear Res. 2019. PMID: 30583198
-
Arithmetic in the signing brain: Differences and similarities in arithmetic processing between deaf signers and hearing non-signers.J Neurosci Res. 2023 Jan;101(1):172-195. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25138. Epub 2022 Oct 19. J Neurosci Res. 2023. PMID: 36259315 Free PMC article.
-
[Hearing impairment and psychopathological disorders in children and adolescents. Review of the recent literature].Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):329-37. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 14615703 Review. French.
-
Individual differences in children's mathematics achievement: The roles of symbolic numerical magnitude processing and domain-general cognitive functions.Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:105-30. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 25. Prog Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27339010 Review.
Cited by
-
The relationship between numerical magnitude processing and math anxiety, and their joint effect on adult math performance, varied by indicators of numerical tasks.Cogn Process. 2024 Aug;25(3):421-442. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01186-0. Epub 2024 Apr 22. Cogn Process. 2024. PMID: 38644404 Free PMC article.
-
Deprivation of Auditory Experience Influences Numerosity Discrimination, but Not Numerosity Estimation.Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):179. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020179. Brain Sci. 2022. PMID: 35203942 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andin J., Ronnberg J., Rudner M. (2014). Deaf signers use phonology to do arithmetic. Learn. Individ. Differ. 32, 246–253. 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.015 - DOI
-
- Arfé B., Lucangeli D., Genovese E., Monzani D., Gubernale M., Trevisi P., et al. . (2011). Analogic and symbolic comparison of numerosity in preschool children with cochlear implants. Deafness Educ. Int. 13, 34–45. 10.1179/1557069X11Y.0000000002 - DOI
-
- Barbosa H. H. (2013). Early mathematical abilities in hearing and deaf children. Cadernos Cedes 33, 333–347. 10.1590/S0101-32622013000300003 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous