Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar 15;13(3):1411-1421.
eCollection 2021.

Intracellular Nampt impairs esophageal squamous cell carcinoma neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response independent of eNampt

Affiliations

Intracellular Nampt impairs esophageal squamous cell carcinoma neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response independent of eNampt

Jiahuang Liu et al. Am J Transl Res. .

Abstract

Nampt consists of iNampt and eNampt, might contribute to modulating obesity-related malignancies and impairing response to chemotherapy in a range of cancers. This study explored the role of Nampt and adiposity in the progression and response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients with ESCC were treated with 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, then evaluated for surgery. Tumor regression grading (TRG) and prognosis of these patients were collected. Anthropometry was well utilized. Serum eNampt was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, iNampt expression in tissues were assessed by PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry. eNampt in sera elevated significantly in these over-weight or obese patients, and was positively associated with body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) and total fat area (TFA) (P<0.05). iNampt expression in the mRNA and protein levels were up-regulated in ESCC compared to their adjacent non-tumor specimens (P<0.05). iNampt protein staining revealed mainly in the cytoplasm and nuclei, while it was not related to serum eNampt, BMI, waist circumference, VFA, SFA and TFA (P>0.05). Pre-treatment iNampt, BMI, SFA, TFA and age significantly correlated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response, and iNampt expression and age were independent predictors (P<0.05). Pre-treatment iNampt, ypT, ypN, ypTNM stage and TRG were associated with the survival of ESCCs, and ypN stage and TRG were independent prognostic factors (P<0.05). In conclusion, iNampt impaired ESCC response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy independent of eNampt, targeting iNampt to increase ESCC response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy would improve the prognosis of ESCCs.

Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; chemotherapy response; nampt; neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; obesity; tumor regression grading.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Response to chemotherapy of ESCC assessed in the pathology by CAP-TRG following 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and H&E stained sections were demonstrated at ×400 magnification. (A) TRS = 0, (B) TRS = 1, (C) TRS = 2, and (D) TRS = 3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy of ESCC evaluated in the image by RECIST 1.1 following 2 cycles of chemotherapy. (A) CR, (B) PR, and (C) SD.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage change of tumor in the image of all the target patients after 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, CR (n = 2), all target lesions disappeared; PR (n = 35), at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions; PD (n = 1), at least a 20% increase; SD (n = 22), neither reached PR nor attained PD.
Figure 4
Figure 4
iNampt expression in ESCC and their adjacent non-tumor tissues (n = 5) was shown, mRNA expression was measured by means of qRT-PCR using β-actin as internal control (A), protein expression was determined by Western blot (B and C). Compared to these adjacent non-tumor, ESCC had elevated iNampt expression in the mRNA level (1.9 ± 0.3 versus 1.0 ± 0.2) and protein level (5.73 ± 1.03% versus 2.12 ± 0.67%). *; P<0.05.
Figure 5
Figure 5
iNampt protein expression in these tumors from endoscopic biopsy was evaluated, and the sections were demonstrated at ×400 magnification. (A) positive staining and (B) negative staining.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-specific survival of ESCCs with 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy following surgery relative to iNampt expression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–132. - PubMed
    1. Huang FL, Yu SJ. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, genetic association, and treatment. Asian J Surg. 2018;41:210–215. - PubMed
    1. Toxopeus E, van der Schaaf M, van Lanschot J, Lagergren J, Lagergren P, van der Gaast A, Wijnhoven B. Outcome of patients treated within and outside a randomized clinical trial on neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: extrapolation of a randomized clinical trial (CROSS) Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2441–2448. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sohda M, Kuwano H. Current status and future prospects for esophageal cancer treatment. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;23:1–11. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources